The Chakri Dynasty’s “Open Door” Policy in Nineteenth Century: The Background of International Intergration Of the Modern Thailand

Abstract

In order to protect Thailand’s independence and sovereignty under the strong pressures of the western powerful nations, Kings of the early Chakri dynasty had the determination to conduct a change from “close door” policy to “open door” policy. It was conducted under the reigns of King Rama IV and Rama V in the middle of nineteenth century. This was not only a new policy but it also became its pioneer in Asia. This “open door” policy was not only to protect Thailand’s independence but also to develop its economy and society. On the basis of economy and society reforms, Thailand government had implemented the reforms on the politics:  turning absolute monarchy into constitutional monarchy. All this helped Thailand to hold a new position in the international relations. Thailand became a nation which had equal position with other nations. It allowed Thailand to integrate with international community, and became a nation which had the first position in the Southeast Asia in the first half of the twentieth.

 

Keywords: “Open door” policy, “Close door” policy, Chakri dynasty, Independence, reform, diplomat, Thailand

References
[1] D. V. Chuong, “Relations between Siam and Vietnam from 1782 to 1846. Doctorat thesis,” Hanoi Pedagogical University, vol. 1, 2003.


[2] P. Damrongrachanuphap, Journey through Burma in 1936, 1991, River Books.


[3] D. G. E. Hall, Southeast Asian history. National politics, Hanoi, 1997.


[4] D. T. Hue, “Reform of the administrative apparatus of King Rama V Journal of Southeast Asian studies,” vol. 1, no. 52, pp. 44–50, 2002.


[5] L. T. A. Dao, “Thailand with veer diplomacy in history,” Journal of Southeast Asian studies, vol. 5, no. 50, pp. 45–52, 2001.


[6] L. A. Dao, “Mongkut (Rama IV, who laid the foundation for Siams reforms in modern times),” Journal of Southeast Asian studies, vol. 2, no. 59, pp. 75–84, 2003.


[7] K. Pramoj, English translation: Chancham Bunnag, English translation, Chancham Bunnag, 1953.


[8] N. Tarling, The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia. Volume 3: from c. 1800 to the 1930s, Cambridge University Press, 1999.


[9] B. J. Terwiel, A history of modern Thailand (1767-1942), University of Queensland Press, 1983.


[10] K. N. T. Trang, “The rudiment of innovation policy in Siam under Rama III (1824- 1851),” Journal of Southeast Asian studies, vol. 10, no. 127, pp. 46–54, 2010.


[11] H. Tinker and W. F. Vella, “Siam Under Rama III, 1824-1851,” Pacific Affairs, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 122, 1959.


[12] S. Zhang, “The role of input, interaction, and output in the development of oral fluency,” English Language Teaching, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 91–100, 2009.