The Debate of Written Corrective Feedback: What to do And Where to Go

Abstract

This article presents the debate of written direct CF (WCF) stated by the previous studies. Being a controversial issue leads written CF into two different positions: that written CF is plausible for ESL and EFL learners (Bitchener et al, 2005; Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2008, 2009, 2010; Bruton, 2007, 2009; Chandler, 2003; Lee, 2008a, 2008b, 2008c; Montgomery & Baker, 2007; Lundstrom & Baker, 2009; Vasquez & Harvey, 2010; Evans et al., 2010) or that it does not contribute significantly for ESL and EFL learners (Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Bruton, 2007). Through the debate, there are two queries revealed: what to do and where to go. Finally, it can be concluded that an effort to assist learners in improving their accuracy of ESL and EFL writing has to be conducted by a teacher, and CF is one of the alternative techniques among others to make the learning outcome better. Moreover, both local and global aspects are to be checked and treated proportionally meaning the written CF should not only concern local aspects but also global aspects. Later, it would be better to evaluate the long term effect of providing WCF on other occasions (a month or a semester after WCF is given).

 

Keywords: Written Direct CF, Indirect CF

References
[1] J. Bitchener, S. Young, and D. Cameron, “The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 191–205, 2005.


[2] J. Bitchener and U. Knoch, “The value of written CF for immigrant and international students,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 19, pp. 207–217.


[3] J. Bitchener, “Measuring the effectiveness of written corrective feedback: A response to ”Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Bitchener (2008)”,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 276–279, 2009.


[4] J. Bitchener and U. Knoch, “The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193–214, 2010.


[5] J. Bitchener and U. Knoch, “Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 207–217, 2010.


[6] A. Bruton, “Vocabulary learning from dictionary referencing and language feedback in EFL translational writing,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 413–431, 2007.


[7] A. Bruton, “Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 136– 140, 2009.


[8] J. Chandler, “The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 267–296, 2003.


[9] R. Ellis, “A typology of written corrective feedback types,” ELT Journal, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2009.


[10] N. W. Evans, K. J. Hartshorn, R. M. McCollum, and M. Wolfersberger, “Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 445–463, 2010.


[11] Bryan. Greetham, How to write better essay, How to write better essay. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2001.


[12] D. Guénette, “Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 40– 53, 2007.


[13] V. Kumar and E. Stracke, “Examiners’ reports on theses: Feedback or assessment?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 211–222, 2011.


[14] I. Lee, “Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 144–164, 2008.


[15] I. Lee, “Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 69–85, 2008.


[16] I. Lee, “Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice,” ELT Journal, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2009.


[17] J. L. Montgomery and W. Baker, “Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 82–99, 2007.


[18] K. McMillan and J. Weyers, How to write essays amp; assignments, Prentice Hall. Pearson, Essex England, 2010.


[19] Don. Shiach, How to write essays, United Kingdom, Oxford, 2009.


[20] G. Taylor, A Student’s Writing Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.


[21] J. Truscott and A. Y.-P. Hsu, “Error correction, revision, and learning,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 292–305, 2008.


[22] N. Warburton, The basic of essay writing, London and New York, Routledge, 2006.


[23] S. C. Weigle, Assessing Writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.


[24] C. Vásquez and J. Harvey, “Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 421– 443, 2010.


[25] E. Zemach Dorothy amp; Rumisek and A. Lisa, College writing, Macmillan Education: Oxford, 2003.