Indonesian Teachers’ Directives In English Language Classrooms
Abstract
English language classrooms as real language settings provide ample linguistic data, be they produced by the teachers or the students, as there are some interactions in exchanging thoughts, feelings, or ideas. Speech acts theory indicates that in using the language, people not only create an isolated series of sentences, but also carry out actions by either doing something or making others do something. By using classroom observations conducted in twelve English language classrooms, this study seeks to describe types of sentence forms and kinds of strategies used by the teachers in giving order. The findings indicate that the teachers in the Department of English, Universitas Negeri Malang, who are in a position of authority over the students, do not always impose on their students in making them do what the teachers want them to do. Even though the interactions in the classrooms are not equal as the amount of teacher talk dominates the teaching and learning process, the students (as the hearer) are aware that they should adhere to the teachers’ speech acts of ordering to be successful in their study.
Keywords: English language classrooms, speech acts theory, directives, sentence forms, speech acts strategies.
References
[1] J. L. Austin, (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[2] L. F. Bachman, (2000). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3] W. Baker and R. Hansen Bricker, “The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback,” System, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2010.
[4] N. Bayat, “A Study on the use of Speech Acts,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 70, no. , pp. 213–221, 2013.
[5] J. L. Benkendorf, M. B. Prince, M. A. Rose, A. De Fina, and H. E. Hamilton, “Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation,” American Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2001.
[6] P. Brown and S. Levinson, Politeness, Some universals of language use, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
[7] H. H. Clark, “Responding to indirect speech acts,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 430–477, 1979.
[8] L. Cummings, (2005). Pragmatics: A multidisciplinary perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[9] C. Dalton-Puffer, “Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalistic classroom discourse: Directives in content-and-language-integrated classrooms,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1275–1293, 2005.
[10] Z. Eslamirasekh, “A cross-cultural comparison of the requestive speech act realization patterns in Persian and American English,” Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, vol. 4, pp. 85–103, 1993.
[11] D. Ferris, “Preparing teachers to respond to student writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 165–193, 2007.
[12] B. Fraser, “Pragmatic markers,” Pragmatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167–190, 1996.
[13] A. Gharbavi and H. Iravani, “Is teacher talk pernicious to students? A discourse analysis of teacher talk,” in Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 98, pp. 552–561, 2014.
[14] C. H. Han, The structure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in universal grammar [Doctoral, thesis], Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, 1998, Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/74.
[15] A. W. He, “The Grammatical and Interactional Organization of Teacher’s Directives: Implications for Socialization of Chinese American Children,” Linguistics and Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–140, 2000.
[16] K. E. Hiani, “Performing Speech Acts among Moroccan EFL Advanced Learners,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 199, pp. 479–485, 2015.
[17] C. Howe and M. Abedin, “Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research,” Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 43, Article ID 0305764, p. 325, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/X.2013.356.
[18] T. Holtgraves, “Comprehending Indirect Replies: When and How Are Their Conveyed Meanings Activated?” Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 519–540, 1999.
[19] Y. Huang, (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20] G. N. Leech, Principles of pragmatics., London, Longman University Press, London, 1983.
[21] N. Mercer, (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984.
[22] J. L. Mey, (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984.
[23] P. Portner, “The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types,” Semantics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 14, pp. 235–252, 2004.
[24] E. Potsdam and D. Edminston, (2005). Imperatives. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo- 9780199772810-0107.xml.
[25] A. P. Sari, “Female EFL learners request realization in relation to their ethnic backgrounds,” TEFLIN Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2010.
[26] J. R. Searle, (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[27] J. R. Searle, “Speech acts and recent linguistics,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 263, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 1975.
[28] J. R. Searle, (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[29] D. M. Shannon, D. J. Twale, and G. R. Hancock, “Use of instructional feedback and modification methods among university faculty,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 1996.
[30] J. Thomas, (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman Publishing Company.
[31] (nd), Imperative clauses (Be quiet!). Retrieved from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/imperative-clausesbe- quiet.
[32] (nd), Imperative. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperative.