Analysis of People Response on Twitter Towards Tidal Wave Disaster in the Southern Coast of Yogyakarta Special Province (Case Studies: Parangtritis Beach, Bantul Regency)

Abstract

In July 2018 the movement of the wind from Australia to the Indian Ocean gives the impact on season transition from rainy to dry season. As the result, the wave becomes so much higher than normal condition as it hits the coastal area as well as in the southern part of Yogyakarta Special Province where is directly bordered with the Indian Ocean. Some impacted areas are popular tourism spots like Parangtritis Beach. The wave wrecks several shops along the beach owned by the local people. The majority of damaged objects are semi-permanent buildings constructed by traditional bamboo and timber. Moreover the tourism activity has been warned due to the dangerous condition. The advancement of technology becomes one of popular issues including the increasing of online social media usage. Internet and gadgets such as smartphone are recently the part of people lifestyle. The nowadays people prefer to access anything online through their smartphone including to find the news on the website or social media such as Twitter. One of interested news is about disaster particularly in recognizable places as well as about tidal wave disaster in Parangtritis Beach. This study aims to investigate the advantages of Twitter contents related to the tidal wave in Parangtritis Beach on people response about the disaster and the beach. The analysis applies sentiment analysis theory. Furthermore the data being collected in this research is online from Twitter accounts that has divided into three phases of disaster (before tidal wave, during tidal wave, and after tidal wave).


 


 


Keywords: Twitter, Tidal Wave, Sentiment Analysis

References
[1] BNPB, 2013. Indeks Risiko Bencana Indonesia 2013-2015. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.


[2] Bollen, J., Mao, H & Pepe, A., 2011. Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena. s.l., s.n., pp. 450-453.


[3] BPS, 2016. Bantul Dalam Angka 2016. BPS – Statistics of Bantul regency.. Yogyakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.


[4] Budiharsono, S., 2001. Teknik Analisis Pembangunan Wilayah Pesisir dan Lautan. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramitha.


[5] Carley, K. M. et al., 2015. Twitter Usage in Indonesia. Thesis Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University.


[6] Chris Cooper, et al., 1993. Tourism Principles & Practice. United Kingdom: Longman Group Limited.


[7] DIY, D., 2016. Statistik Kepariwisataan, Yogyakarta: Dinas Pariwisata Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.


[8] Goodchild, M. F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), p. 211–221.


[9] Hartato, E., Delikostidis, I. & De Róiste, M., 2017. Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) for Disaster Management A Case Study for Floods in Jakarta. Msc Thesis University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury: University of Canterbury.


[10] Henrique, J., 2018. Get Old Tweets-python. [Online] Available at: https://github.com/ Jefferson-Henrique/GetOldTweets-python [Accessed 26 August 2018].


[11] Kharde, V. A. & Sonawane, S. S., 2016. Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data: A Survey of Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 139(11), pp. 5-15.


[12] Kusumo, A. N. L., Reckien, D. & Verplanke, J., 2017. Utilising volunteered geographic information to assess resident’s flood evacuation shelters. Case study: Jakarta. Applied Geography, 88(1), pp. 174-185.


[13] Liu, B., 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. s.l.:Morgan & Claypool Publishers.


[14] Pang, B. & Lee, L., 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundation and Trends in Information Retrieval„ 1-2(2), pp. 1-135.


[15] PGSP & BIG, 2016. Buku Deskripsi Peta Desa Parangtritis (PSGP & BIG). Yogyakarta: PSGP & BIG.


[16] Rosser, J. F., Leibovici, D. G. & Jackson, M. J., 2017. Rapid flood inundation mapping using social media, remote sensing and topographic data. Natural Hazards, 87(1), p. 103–120.


[17] Saxton, G. D., Oh, O. & Kishore, R., 2013. Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control. Journal of Information Systems Management, 2(30), pp. 2-20.


[18] Sönmez, S. F., 1998. Tourism, Terrorism, and Political Instability. Annals of Tourism Research, Volume 22, pp. 416-456..


[19] Spencer, J. & Uchyigit, G., n.d. Sentimentor: Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data, Brighton: University of Brighton.


[20] Statista, 2018. Global Digital Population as of July 2018 (In Millions). [Online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital populationworldwide/ [Accessed 25 September 2018].


[21] Sunarto, Marfai, M. & Mardiatno, D., 2010. Multirisk Assessment of Disasters in Parangtritis Coastal Area: A Comprehensive Analysis to Build Public Awareness Towards Various Events of Disasters. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.


[22] Wang, H. et al., 2012. A System for Real-Time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. s.l., s.n., pp. 115-120.


[23] Wu, L. & Hayashi, H., 2014. An Analysis of Tourist Perception and Attitude toward Disasters: A Case Study of Recent Chinese Large Earthquake Disasters. Journal of Social Safety Science, 24(1), pp. 311-320.