Privacy and Social Media: Defining Privacy in the Usage of Path


The existence of social media has changed the landscape of human’s relationship. Through social media, people are able to present many versions of themselves in many platforms. In this era of polymediation of the self, the discussion regarding to privacy becomes arguable, moreover, with the presence of Path; a social media platform which presents itself as a private social media. Hence, in the sociocultural context of Indonesian society, it is important to see how the definition of privacy is constructed by the existence of Path. Therefore, this research is conducted in order to analyze and explore how privacy is perceived by the social media users nowadays, particularly the users of Path, and why they perceive it in that certain way. This research is conducted with ethnography as the main method and virtual ethnography as the supporting method. From the research, it is found that users’ way of defining privacy is embodied in two levels: online self-presentation and personal space construction. In the first level, the stages of privacy offered by Path have created the fragmented-self among users. This fragmentation has resulted in “the ambivalent self”, “self that desires recognition”, and “self that searches for freedom”. In the second level, the mediality of Path has served the users of the ability to construct their own personal space in social media space. This construction of the personal space has resulted in “space of comfort in similarity”, “space of pseudo-liberation”, and “space that demolishes the panoptic”. Henceforth, these findings lead to a conclusion that usage practices of social media has killed the authentic self and created a personal space that gives the sense of the absence of control, hierarchy, and social surveillance. Eventually, privacy for Path is defined by the process of exchange of “the self and personal information” with “social recognition, sense of equality, and reciprocal relationship”.



Keywords: privacy, social media, ethnography, Path

[1] Agger, Ben. (1998). Critical Social Theories: An Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.

[2] Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen. (2000). “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist, Vol 55(5), May 2000, 469-480.

[3] Arnold Giovanni Pinem. (2014). “Pola Komunikasi Pengguna Sosial Media Path”. Access in

[4] Barnes, Susan B. (2006). “A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States”. First Monday, [S.l.], September 2006. ISSN 13960466.

[5] Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckman. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

[6] Blasco, Paloma Gay y & Huon Wardle. (2007). How to Read Ethnography. London: Routledge.

[7] Bourdieu, Pierre. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[8] Capurro, Rafael, Michael Eldred, & Daniel Nagel. (2013). Digital Whoness: Identity, Privacy and Freedom in the Cyberworld. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

[9] Cook, Deborah. (1996). The Culture Industry Revisited: Theodor W. Adorno on Mass Culture. Oxford: Bowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

[10] Cover, Rob. (2016). Digital Identities: Creating and Communicating the Online Self. Oxford: Academic Press.

[11] Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (1997). Media/society: Industries, images and audiences. London: Pine Forge Press.

[12] Dahlgren, Peter. (2005). “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation”. Political Communication, 22:2, 147-162. DOI: 10.1080/10584600590933160

[13] Dahlgren, Peter. (2013). The Political Web: Media, Participation, and Alternative Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[14] Debord, Guy. (2002). The Society of the Spectacle. Diterjemahkan oleh Ken Knabb. Canberra: Hobgoblin Press.

[15] Dijck, Jose van. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.

[16] Durham, Meenakshi Gigi & Douglas Kellner (ed.). (2006). Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks Revised Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

[17] Eldred, Michael. (2013). “Digital whoness in connection with privacy, publicness and freedom”. In Capurro, Rafael, Michael Eldred, & Daniel Nagel. Digital Whoness: Identity, Privacy and Freedom in the Cyberworld, p. 127-209. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

[18] Ellison, N. B. & Danah Boyd. (2007). “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Vol. 13, Issue 1, p210- 230, Blackwell.

[19] Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

[20] Foucault, Michel. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Translated by Colin Gordon et. al. New York: Pantheon.

[21] Flew, Terry. (2007). New Media: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[22] Fuchs, Christian. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.

[23] Giddens, Anthony. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[24] Goldenfein, Jake. (2013). “Police Photography and Privacy: Identity, Stigma and Reasonable Expectation”. University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013. Access in SSRN:

[25] Hall, Stuart (ed.). (1992). Culture, Media, Language. London: Routledge.

[26] Hampton, Keith N., Inyoung Shin & Weixu Lu. (2017). “Social media and political discussion: when online presence silences offline conversation”. Information, Communication & Society. 20 (7): 1090-1107. DOI:10.1080/136918x.2016.1218526. ISSN 1369-118X.

[27] Herbig, Art, Andrew F. Herrmann & Adam W. Tyma (ed.). (2015). Beyond New Media: Discourse and Critique in a Polymediated Age. London: Lexington Books.

[28] Hine, Christine. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.

[29] Horkheimer, Max & Theodor W. Adorno. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: The Seabury Press.

[30] Jenkins, Henry. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New Yor University Press.

[31] Joinson, Adam N., Tom Buchanan, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, & Carina Paine Schofield. (2010). “Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online”. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction., 25. 1-24. 10.1080/07370020903586662. Access in. nline

[32] Kellner, Douglas. (2001). Media and Cultural Studies. US: Wiley-Blackwell.

[33] Kwon, Sang Hee, Kyung Ho Hwang, & Do Hyun Jo. (2011). “Time and Space Perception on Media Platforms”. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, Volume 12, 2011, pp. 25-48.

[34] Levy, Pierre. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Perseus Books.

[35] Livingstone, Sonia. (2002). Young People and New Media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: SAGE Publications.

[36] Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (1992). Mass Consumption and Personal Identity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

[37] McLuhan, Marshall & Lewis H. Lapham. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.

[38] McQuail, Dennis. (2000). Mass Communication Theory 4th Edition. London: SAGE Publications.

[39] McRobbie, Angela. (1994). Postmodernism and Popular Culture. London: Routledge.

[40] McRobbie, Angela. (2005). The Uses of Cultural Studies. London: SAGE Publications.

[41] Moores, Shaun. (1993). Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. London: SAGE Publications.

[42] Nightingale, Virginia. (2003). “The Cultural Revolution in Audience Research”. In Angharad N. Valdivia (ed.). A Companion to Media Studies, p. 360-381. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.

[43] Orgad, Shani. (2007). “The Internet as a moral space: the legacy of Roger Livingstone”. New Media & Society, Vol 9, Issue 1, 1 February 2007, pp. 33-41. Access in

[44] PEW Research Center & The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Univrsity. (2013). “Teens, Social Media, and Privacy”. Access in http://www.

[45] Ponemon Institute LLC. (2015). “Privacy and Security in a Connected Life: A Study of US, European and Japanese Consumers”. Access in rt_privacy_and_security_in_a_connected_life.pdf

[46] Prensky, Marc. (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants”. On the Horizon. MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001, pp. 1-6, 10748120110424816

[47] Ross, Karen & Virginia Nightingale. (2003). Media and Audiences: New Perspectives. California: Open University Press.

[48] Schoeman, Ferdinand David. (1992). Privacy and social freedom. Cambridge: Press Syndicate.

[49] Silverstone, Roger. (2003). “Proper Distance: Towards an Ethics for Cyberspace”, in G. Liestol,A. Morrison and R.Terje (ed), pp. 469–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Access in (pp. 1–25).

[50] Saukko, Paula. (2003). Doing Research in Cultural Studies: An introduction to classical and new methodological approaches. London: SAGE Publications.

[51] Stefanick, Lorna. (2011). Controlling Knowledge: Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection in a Networked World. Athabasca University: AU Press.

[52] Straubhaar, Joseph, Robert LaRose & Lucinda Davenport. (2012). Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

[53] Sunstein, Cass R. (2001). Echo Chambers: Bush V. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

[54] Takahashi, Toshie. (2016). “Creating the Self in the Digital Age”. The Good Life in Asia’s Digital 21st Century, pp. 44–50. Hong Kong: Digital Asia Hub.

[55] Trepte, Sabine & Leonard Reinecke (ed.). (2011). Privacy Online: Perspective on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web. Heidelberg: Springer.

[56] Valdivia, Angharad N. (ed.). (2003). A Companion to Media Studies. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.

[57] van der Velden, Maja & Khaled El Emam. (2012). “Not all my friends need to know: a qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media”. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association ( JAMIA), Volume 20, Issue 1, 1 January 2013, Pages 16-24. Access in

[58] Woolgar, Steve. (2002). Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[59] Zhao S. (2008). “Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships”. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 24, 2008, pp. 1816– 1836. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012