Powerful and Powerless Language Usage Between Genders: A Case Study Among Lecturers

Abstract

This study investigates the gender language used in workplace; specifically, on the comparison and exploration of power language between male and female lecturers who are teaching in the education field. In the effort to answer whether the general opinion that man includes more power language in their speech compared to woman; equal numbers of participants are chosen from both genders and several observations of teaching and learning sessions initiated by the participants in their respective classes were conducted by the researchers. The language used by all participants was analyzed based on the use of two language expressions; directives and elicitations. The results of the findings suggest that male lecturers used more directives and elicitations; with Male Lecturer A, who used a total of 27% power languages and Male Lecturer B, who used a total of 35% power languages. The power language used by the female lecturers are relatively less than male lecturers; with both female lecturers: Female Lecturer A and B each using a total of 19% power languages in their speech. Therefore, the study shows that male uses more power language than women. However, this study also indicates that the use of their power language also depends on the context of their language usage.


 


 


Keywords: powerful language, powerless language, gender language, dominance theory, interactive positioning

References
[1] Abdullah Yusoff, S. (2010). Household decision making and expenditure patterns of married men and women in Malaysia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(3), 371-381.


[2] Areni, C. S., & Sparks, J. R. (2005). Language power and persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 22(6), 507-525.


[3] Blankenship, K,L., & Craig T.Y. (2005) Language and persuasion: tag questions as powerless speech or as interpret in context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(1), 112-118.


[4] Bogum, Y. (2008). Uninvited guests: the influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495-522.


[5] Bars, H., Tews, E., & Robling, G. (2005). Improving feedback and classroom interaction using mobile phones. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning. Qarwa, Malta, 28-30 June 2005.


[6] Cowie, C. (2000, July). Gender language: Interruption and overlapping. Paper presented at Seminar, cross-cultural pragmatics of English.


[7] Harré, R. et. al. (2009) Recent advances in Positioning Theory. Theory and Psychology, 19(1), 5-31.


[8] Herrick J.W (1999). “And Then She Said”: office stories and what they tell us about gender in the workplace. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(3), 274-296.


[9] Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185-205.


[10] Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. Hampshire, England: Macmillan Distribution Ltd.


[11] Lovorn M., et. al (2012). Who’s in control? teachers from five countries on power dynamics in learning environment. Journal of Research in International Education, 11 (1), 70-86.


[12] McGinty, M. S. (2001). Power Talk: Using Language To Build Authority and Influence. New York: Warner Business Books.


[13] Nemeti, A., & Bayer, J. M. (2007). Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: A comparative study of persian and english. Suagm.Edu, 185-201.


[14] Newman et al (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, (45), 211-236.


[15] Rangkuti, R., & Lubis, A. P. (2018, April 18). 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature. Retrieved March 02, 2019, from http://aicll.sastra.uisu.ac. id/index.php/aicll/article/view/34/34


[16] Robinson, M., Frost, D., Buccigrossi, J., & Pfeffer, C. (2003). Gender: Power and privilege. Retrieved from http://www.consumerstar.org/resources/pdf/Gender_4.pdf


[17] Vine, B. (2004) Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


[18] Xu, L. (2010). Power adjustment in professional women’s language: an investigation into the use of directives in the TV series Cashmere Mafia.