Flood Risk Reduction Model on Small Medium Enterprises

Abstract

The main risk of flood for SMEs is the damage in production equipment and production site. As the business unit that suffered the most losses due to flood, flood risk for SMEs should be reduced. This study aimed to identify who are the stakeholders involved in the existing institutions, identify interests of stakeholders involved in flood risk reduction, analyzing the influence and dependence of stakeholders in reducing flood risk, analyzing the relationship between stakeholders in efforts to reduce flood risk, modeling relationships among stakeholders in efforts to reduce flood risk for small and medium enterprises in Klaten, Central Java, Indonesia. Mixed method approach, which is the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, was employed. Population of this study is SMEs in the flood-prone area in Klaten Regency. Structured interview was done to collect the data. Data analysis used stakeholder analysis based on the MICMAC and MACTOR program. The results of these study 13 stakeholders have crucial role in reducing flood risk. Their interests can be divided into humanity, main duty, safety, image, and income. In the effort of reducing the flood risks, BPBD together with respective village head and volunteers have the central role, while university has the lowest contribution.


 


 


Keywords: risk reduction, flood, vulnerability, stakeholders, SMEs

References
[1] Setyawan, A.A., Isa, M. & Wajdi, F. (2012). Model pengembangan manajemen resiko bencana dan potensi pembiayaan mikro pasca bencana bagi UMKM di Kota Surakarta. Report of PPMB FE UMS – AIFDR AUSAID.


[2] Setyawan, A.A., Isa, M., Wajdi M. F., Syamsudin. (2018). Disaster as business Risk in SME: An exploratory study. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 6(6), 52-63.


[3] Isa, M., Sugiyanto, FX, Susilowati, I, (2018) Community resilience to floods in the coastal zone for disaster risk reduction, Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 10 (1), 7


[4] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2016). Data Informasi Bencana Indonesia. Jakarta: BNPB.


[5] Isa, M. (2016). Bencana alam: berdampak positif atau negatif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi?. The 3rd University Research Colloquium, Kudus.


[6] Isa, M. (2012). Manajemen resiko bisnis UMKM Kota Surakarta. BENEFIT Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 16(2).


[7] Isa, M., Sugiyanto, FX, Susilowati, I, (2015). Adaptation and mitigation model for people to restore their ecosystem from flood in Semarang, Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 16(2).


[8] Swart R. dan Frank R. (2007). Making Integration of Adaptation and Mitigation Work: Mainstreaming Into Sustainable Development Policies? CLIMATE POLICY 7 (2007) 288–303.


[9] McEntire, D. (2012). Understanding and Reducing Vulnerability: From The Approach of Liabilities and Capabilities, Disaster Prevention and Management, 21, 2,: 206-225.


[10] Subarudi. (2008). Tata Kelola Kehutanan yang Baik: Sebuah Pembelajaran dari Sragen. Jurnal Kebijakan Kehutanan Vol. 05:03.


[11] Hermans, L.M., & Thissen, W.A.H. (2009). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 808-818.


[12] Mandal, Anukul dan Deshmukh, S.G. (1994). Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol 14(6). pp 52-59.


[13] Godet, M. (1991). Actors’ move and strategis: The MACTOR method an air transport. Futures Journal, 605–622.


[14] Rees, G.H. et al. (2017). Data gathering for actor analyses: A research note on the collection and aggregation of individual respondent data for MACTOR. Future Journal, 9(1), 115–137.


[15] Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability: Global Environmental change, 16: 268-281.


[16] Luers, A.L. (2005). “The Surface of Vulnerability: An Analytic Framework for Examining Environmental Change”,Global Environmental Change 15: 214–223.


[17] Allen. (2005). Climate Change Risk and Vulnerability. Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 159


[18] Weis, S.W., Agostini, V.N., Roth, L.M., Gilmer, B., Schill, S.R., Knowles, J.E., Blyther, R. (2016). Assessing Vulnerability: An Integrated Approach For Mapping Adaptive, Sensitivity, And Exposure. Climate Change (2016) 136:615-629.