Farmers’ Attitudes Toward Recycled Water Use in Irrigated Agriculture
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether farmers are willing to use recycled water for irrigation purposes. It attempts to analyze the attitudinal, socio-demographics and environmental factors that affect a potential user’s acceptance for wastewater reuse. A primary research designed in order to elicit farmers’ preferences and a statistical analysis applied to analyze the relationships among the variables influence their attitudes. The results were obtained from data collected through 302 questionnaires that were answered by the farmers in Nestos catchment, Greece. The research findings might usefully assist policy-makers and planners in the implementation of strategy in water management sector. Farmers’ awareness about the recycling water and their level of acceptance to use it might constitute incoming parameters, on which the decisions in agriculture water planning could be based. Moreover, the identification of factors influencing stakeholders’ acceptance provide the underpinnings for success in any recycling project.
Keywords: public perceptions, behavior analysis, water recycling, integrated water resources management, agriculture water management
References
[1] Alcon, F., Martin-Ortega, J., Berbel, J., de Miguel, M.D. (2012). Environmental benefits of reclaimed water: an economic assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Water Policy, vol. 14, pp. 148–159. doi:10.2166/wp. 2011.001.
[2] Chen, W.Y., Hua, J., 2015. Citizens’ distrust of government and their protest responses in a contingent valuation study of urban heritage trees in Guangzhou, China. Journal Environmental Management, vol. 155, pp. 40–48.
[3] Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., Grun, B. (2011). What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Research, vol. 45, pp. 933–943.
[4] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2012). Coping with Water Scarcity: an Action Framework for Agriculture and Food Security. FAO Water Reports. Rome, Italy.
[5] Ganoulis, J., Skoulikaris, H., Monget, J.M. (2008). Involving stakeholders in transboundary water resources management: the Mesta/Nestos ‘HELP’ basin. Water SA, vol. 34, pp. 461–467
[6] Garcia, X., Pargament, D. (2015). Reusing wastewater to cope with water scarcity: Economic, social and environmental considerations for decision-making. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 101, pp. 154–166.
[7] McKay, J., Hurlimann, A. (2003). Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 1. Age. Journal of the Australian Water Association, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 45–49.
[8] Lazaridou, D., Michailidis, A., Trigkas, M. (2018). Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ willingness to undertake environmental responsibility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. doi:10.1007/s1135.
[9] Meyer, J., Sale, M., Mulholland, P., Poff, N. (1999). Impacts of climate change on aquatic ecosystem functioning and health. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1373–1386.
[10] Pedreira, R., Kallioras, A., Pliakas, F., Gkiougkis, I., Schuth, C. (2015). Groundwater vulnerability assessment of a coastal aquifer system at River Nestos eastern Delta, Greece. Environmental Earth Science, vol. 73, pp. 6387–6415.
[11] Pedrero, F., Kalavrouziotis, I., Alarcón, J.J., Koukoulakis, P., Asano, T. (2010). Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture—Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agriculture Water Management, vol. 97, pp. 1233–1241.
[12] Plumlee, M.H., Gurr, C.J., Reinhard, M. (2012). Recycled water for stream flow augmentation benefits, challenges, and the presence of wastewater-derived organic compounds. Science of the Total Environment, vol. 438, pp. 541–548.
[13] Sowers, J., Vengosh, A., Weinthal, E. (2011). Climate change water resources, and the politics of adaptation in the Middle East and North Africa. Climatic Change, vol. 104, pp. 599–627.
[14] Wiek, A., Larson, K.L. (2012). Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resource Management, vol. 26, pp. 3153–3171.