Influence of Regional Financial Responsibility, Degree of Fiscal Desentralization and Level Financing Level to Allocation of Capital Government Regency / Central Java City
Abstract
The purpose of his study is to examine the influence of regional financial dependence, the degree of fiscal decentralization, and the financing of SILPA on allocation capital expenditure of regency/municipal governments in Central Java period 2014-2016. While the population used by all district/municipal governments in Central Java period 2014-2016 with sampling technique using saturated sampling so that the sample used is 105 local government financial statements (LKPD). The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis, with the help of SPSS 22 program. The result of the research shows that the variable of fiscal decentralization degree, and SILPA financing influence to capital expenditure allocation, while the dependent variable of finance does not affect the allocation of capital expenditure. So the independent variable capable of completing the dependent variable of 5.3%.
Keywords: Allocation of Capital Expenditure, Dependency of Regional Finance, Fiscal Decentralization Degree, and Financing of SILPA.
References
[1] Abdullah, H., (2004). PengaruhKejelasanAnggaran, PengendalianAkuntansi, danSistemPelaporanTerhadapAkuntabilitasKinerjaInstansiPemerintahPadaKabupatendan Kota di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Tesis. Program PascaSarjana UGM.: Yogyakarta.
[2] Andrie Novandy, A. M. P. dan R. (2015). Pengaruh Belanja Langsung dan Sisa Lebih Perhitungan Anggaran (SiLPA) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jurnal Katalogis, 3(9), 147–158.
[3] Chen, Z., Pan, J., Wang, L., & Shen, X. (2016). Disclosure of government financial information and the cost of local government’s debt financing—Empirical evidence from provincial investment bonds for urban construction. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.02.001
[4] Gerungan, Sylvia Febriany; David P.E. Saerang; danWinston Pontoh. 2015. PengaruhKinerjaKeuanganKabupaten/ Kota TerhadapAlokasiBelanja Modal di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara.JurnalRisetAkuntansi Dan Auditing, Vol. 6(1):12-29.
[5] Havid Sularso, Y. E. R. (2011). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap ALokasi Belanja Modal dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Tengah. Media Riset Akotansi,1(2), 109–124.
[6] Mochamad Fajar Hidayat, G. M. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Daerah Terhadap alokasi Belanja Modal (Studi pada Kabupaten dan Kota di Jawa Timur). Ilmiah, Jurnal.
[7] Jensen, Michael C. danWilliam H.Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3: 305-360.
[8] Kadek Martini, A. A. N. B. D. (2015). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Daerah Pada APBD Kabupaten Dan Kota Di Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(2), 426–443.
[9] Mahmudi. 2007. Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah: Panduan Bagi Eksekutif, DPRD, dan Masyarakat dalam Pemngambilan Keputusan Ekonomi, Sosial dan Politik. Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbitdan Percetakan YKPN
[10] Masaki, T. (2018). The impact of intergovernmental transfers on local revenue generation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Tanzania. World Development, 106, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.026
[11] Simamora, S. (2014). Pengaruh Sisa Lebih Perhitungan Anggaran (SILPA), Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Pembiayaan Terhadap Belanja Daerah: Dalam Presfekti Teorits. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 14 No. 2(September), 258–271.
[12] Suwandi, K. A., & Tahar, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah dengan Alokasi Belanja Modal Sebagai Variabel Intervening
(Studi pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota D.I. Yogyakarta). Jurnal InFestasi, 11(2), 118–136.
[13] Yang, Z. 2016. “Tax Reform, Fiscal Decentralization, andRegional Economic Growth: New Evidence from China.”Economic Modelling 59: 520–528.
[14] Yushkov, A. (2015). Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth: Theory, Empirics, and the Russian Experience. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.02.004