Saving the Native Faith: Religious Nationalism in Slavic Neo-paganism (Ancient Russian Yngling Church of Orthodox Old Believers-Ynglings and Svarozhichi)
Abstract
Today dynamically developing neo-pagan communities in Ural and Siberia supply a discursive frame for national identities, group values and political ideologies. They share norms of ethnic solidarity, national unity, traditionalism and national awakening, just as the concepts of national peculiarity and anti-westernism. Russian patriotism, devotion to tribal ideals and the preposition about world’s multiplicity (material and spiritual) are considered as ethical principals. The subject of this paper is the neo-pagan community of Ynglings in Western Siberia and the movement Svarozhichi in Ural region. These two movements have seldom been discussed in research literature and they provide interesting case studies of nationalistic new religiosity in the provincial Russia. Participants of these communities are fostering ethnic revival: not only remembering the glorious past, but also rebuilding it, here and now. The movement‘s legitimacy is based on a presumed continuity with the cultural heritage of pagan ancestors. They advocate a conception of Slavs unity based on Aryan identity and the willingness to give up Christianity, which is deemed responsible for two thousand years of identity aberrations.
Keywords: neo-paganism, religious nationalism, traditionalism, Ural, Western Siberia
References
[1] Aitamurto, K. 2015. “More Russian than Orthodox Christianity: Russian Paganism as Nationalist Politics.” In Nations under God: The Geopolitics of Faith in the Twenty-First Century, edited by M. Luke, 126-132. Herrington, Alasdair McKay & Jeffrey Haynes, Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
[2] Brubaker, R. 2011. “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches.” Nations and Nationalism. Retrieved from: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/brubaker/ Publications/religion_and_nationalism_forthcoming.pdf
[3] Ferlat, A. 2003. “Neopaganism and new age in Russia.” Folklore, 23: 40–48.
[4] Golovneva, E and I. Shmidt. 2015. “Religious Conversion, Utopia and Sacred Space (Okunevo Village in Western Siberia).” State, Religion and Church, 2 (2): 54-76.
[5] Inglehart, R. and W. Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review,65 (1) 41.
[6] Khinevich, A. 2004. “Velikoi lyubvi vsegda predshestvovali mudrye znaniya.” Vedicheskaya kul‘tura, 3: 12-13.
[7] Laruelle, M. 2008. “Alternative Identity, alternative religion? Neo-paganism and the Aryan Myth in contemporary Russia.” Nations and Nationalism, 14 (2): 283-301.
[8] Pike, S. M. 2001. Early Bodies, Magical Selves: Contemporary Pagans and the Search for Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[9] Seleznev, A. G. 2014. “Novaia mifologiia istorii: Arkhetip ‘drevnikh tsivilizatsii’ i sakral’nyitsentr v raione derevni Okunevo” [A new mythology of history: The archetype of ‘ancient civilizations’ and the sacred center near the village of Okunevo]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 5: 41–59.
[10] Smith, A.D. 1999. The Ethnic Origin of Nations Blackwell Publishing.
[11] Yashin, V. 2000. “Nekotorye tendentsii religioznykh protsessov v Omskoi oblasti nachala XXI veka” [Some tendencies in religious processes in Omsk oblast at the beginning of the XXI century]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal po mul’tikul’turnym obshchestvam, special issue, Religioznoe mnogoobrazie Rossiiskoi Federatsii (russkaia versiia), 2 (2): 28–40.