Download fulltext HTML
Sari, T. P., & Rahmawati, F. (2018). The Analysis of Excellent Economic Sector in Regional Economic Building in Kediri City 2012–2015. KnE Social Sciences, 3(3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i3.1876

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i3.1876

statistics

  • 336 Abstract Views
  • 407 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • T P Sari
    No author data available.
  • F Rahmawati
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Apr 23, 2018

The Analysis of Excellent Economic Sector in Regional Economic Building in Kediri City 2012–2015

KnE Social Sciences / The First International Research Conference on Economics and Business (IRCEB) / Pages 91–103

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the economic sectors that excel in any category of contribution and growth; (2) the sector that can create jobs to the maximum; (3) The most efficient sectors to be developed; and (4) the growth pattern of economic sectors in the area of Kediri. This type of research is quantitative descriptive. with the calculation of secondary data for the period 2012-2015. The analytical method used is the analysis of Location Quotient (LQ), Growth Ratio Model (GRM), Elasticity Employment, ICOR and Typology Klassen. The results showed that (1) the manufacturing industry is the only comparative advantage of Kediri based on criteria of contribution, while the dominant sector is based on growth the is trade, hotels and restaurants; transport and communications; and the services sector; (2) sectors with potential to absorb labor maximum is agriculture, livestock, forestry and fisheries; the construction sector; trade, hotels and restaurants; and transport and communications; (3) an efficient sector to be developed in the town of Kediri, namely agriculture, livestock, forestry and fisheries; transport and communications; the financial sector, real estate and business services; and the services sector; (4) based on (3) an efficient sector to be developed in the town of Kediri, namely agriculture, livestock, forestry and fisheries; transport and communications; the financial sector, real estate and business services; and the services sector; (4) based on the growth pattern of each sector there is no sector that is advancing and growing rapidly or quadrant I, the sector that includes quadrant II is a sector forward but stressed that is manufacturing sector, quadrant III potential sectors there are mining and quarrying, trade, hotels and restaurants, and the services sector, while the five other sectors is relatively lagging sector.


 


Keywords: Leading Economic Potential, Economic Development

References
[1] Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Ekonomi Wilayah.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.


[2] Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2014. Pertumbuhan Wilayah dan Wilayah pertumbuhan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.


[3] Arsyad, Lincolin. 2004. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.


[4] Aswandi, H. dan Kuncoro, M. 2002. Evaluasi Penetapan Kawasan Andalan: Struktur Empiris Kalimantan Selatan 1993-1999.Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 17 (1), 27-45.


[5] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Kediri. 2016. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kota Kediri Menurut Lapangan Usaha tahun 2011-2015. (Online), (http://kedirikota.bps.go.id), diakses 21 Oktober 2016.


[6] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Kediri. 2016. Statistik Daerah Kota Kediri 2016.(Online), (http://kedirikota.bps.go.id), diakses 18 Februari 2017.


[7] Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. 2016. Laporan Eksekutif Keadaan Angkatan Kerja di Jawa Timur tahun 2010-2015.(Online), (http://jatim.bps.go.id), diakses 15 Februari 2017.


[8] Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. 2016. Provinsi Jawa Timur Dalam Angka 2016.(Online), (http://jatim.bps.go.id), diakses 21 Oktober 2016.


[9] Basuki, T. Agus & gayatri. 2009. Penentu Sektor Unggulan Dalam Pembangunan Daerah: Studi Kasius di Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir.Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 10 (1): 34-50.


[10] Erika, R. 2013. Analisis Sektor-Sektor Ekonomi dalam Rangka Pengembangan Kebijakan Pembangunan Ekonomi Kota Kediri. JESP, 5 (1): 65-80.


[11] Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2004. Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah: Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi dan Peluang.Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.


[12] Ma’ruf, Ahmad. 2009. Anatomi Makro Ekonomi Regional: Studi kasus Provinsi DIY. JEJAK,(Online), 2 (2), (http://ep.unnes.ac.id), diakses 06 Desember 2016.


[13] Mangun, Nudiatulhuda. 2007. Analisis Potensi Ekonomi Kabupaten dan Kota di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. [Tesis]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.


[14] Mukhlis, Imam. 2011. Ekonomi Pembangunan. (Agus Eko S.). Tulungagung: Cahaya Abadi.


[15] Purwanti, Dewi. 2009. Analisis Sektor Unggulan dalam Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Kabupaten Muara Enim Provinsi Sumatra Selatan. [Skripsi]. Bogor: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor.


[16] Setiyanto, Adi. 2015. Icor Sektor Pertanian Sebagai Basis Arah Investasi Dalam Pembangunan Pertanian Berbasis Kabupaten/Kota Di Indonesia.Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 10 (13): 75-108.


[17] Simanjuntak, J. Payaman. 2001. Pengantar Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia.Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.


[18] Soeparmoko. 2002. Ekonomi Publik Untuk Keuangan dan Pembangunan Daerah. Edisi pertama. Yogyakarta.


[19] Sukirno, Sadono. 1985. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jakarta: LPEF-UI Bima Grafika.


[20] Sumarsono, S. 2006. Teori dan Kebijakan Publik Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.


[21] Sutawi. 2015. Mapping of Leading Livestock Subsector in East Java Province. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.


[22] Tarigan, Robinson. 2005. Ekonomi Regional: Teori dan Aplikasi(Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.