KnE Life Sciences | The 2nd International Meeting of Public Health 2016 (IMOPH) – Part II | pages: 81–88

, , and

1. Introduction

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) is an infectious disease that can be fateful within a relatively short time. This disease can affect all ages both children and adults. The cause of this disease is dengue virus into the human body through the bite of Aedes aegypti (Anggraeni 2010).

According to WHO (2001), there were 2.5-3 million peoples at risk of infected DHF. DHF is an urban disease, but it begins to spread to the countryside. DHF is estimated to be 50-100 million cases per year, while 500.000 cases of DHF require hospitalization each year with 90% of them were children, aged less than 15 years and the death rate reached 5% of all cases of DHF.

According to P2PL Director in (Health Department, 2010) in 2008 the total of dengue cases amounted to 137.469 (IR = 59.02 per 100,000 population) with 1,187 deaths (CFR = 0.86%). The total of cases in the year 2009 was 154,855 with the number of the death to be 1,384 (CFR = 0.89%), increasing when compared to the 2008., even had occurred KLB in 6 provinces are West Kalimantan, North Sumatra, Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, and Babel includes 25 District / City.

Annual Report P2PL Health Office Jambi Province (2010) showed that the incident and the death figure in Jambi Province from 2007 until 2009 were likely to fluctuate. In 2007, IR dengue hemorrhagic fever in Jambi province was 1.6 per 100,000 populations. In 2008, it increased to 8.6 per 100,000 people while in 2009, it amounted to 7.9 per 100,000 people. When compared with a strong indicator in Jambi, the incident was still far from the target (5 per 100,000 population). The total of deaths due to DHF in Jambi Province in 2008 is 9 cases (3.67%), in 2009 were five cases (2.12%), showing that it was still above the target of CFR DHF that was less 1%.

In 2009, Tebo District had the largest IR by 5 per 100,000 people, making it as the endemic occurence of DHF. From 2006 - 2009, the incident was likely to increase. There were 5:55 per 100,000 in 2006; 6:45 per 100,000 in 2007; 9:68 per 100,000 population in 2008; and 5 per 100,000 in 2009.

Rimbo Ulu Subdistrict was the largest subdistrict accounted for dengue cases in Tebo throughout the year 2008 (117 cases) with dengue incidence of 348.9 per 100,000 live births, while in 2009, it was 35.9 per 100,000 live births. Rimbo Ulu Subdistrict has six villages, but not all of the communities were accounted for the incidence of dengue. Villages accounted for most cases of dengue in 2008 were Suka Damai with 33 cases; Suka Maju with 22 cases; Sido Rukun with 13 cases; Wana Reja and Sumber Sari with 33 cases. In 2009, Suka Damai Village was still in the first position in contributing to the dengue incidence by six cases, followed by Sido Rukun with four cases, Suka Maju with one case, and Sumber Sari with one case.

Because dengue cases was still high and likely to rise in the Suka Damai Village Rimbo Ulu Subdistrict, it was necessary to lower them again. Preventing and combating community behavior DHF needed the better methods. Based on the background, the researchers were interested in doing a research by the title “Behavior Society in Mosquito Eradication Project Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Suka Damai, Rimbo Ulu Subddistrict, Tebo District, Jambi Province In 2011”.

The purpose of the research was to know the behavior of the Communities in the mosquito eradication and to know the factors that influenced it. The particular purpose of this study were to describe behavior in the mosquito eradication; to describe the level of education; to specify the level of knowledge about dengue; to Know the knowledge level overview of the mosquito eradication; to describe attitudes towards the mosquito eradication; to determine the relationship between level of education and people's behavior in the mosquito eradication; to determine the relationship between the level of knowledge about dengue with people's behavior the mosquito eradication; to determine the relationship between the level of expertise about PSN DBD with people's behavior in the mosquito eradication; to determine the relationship between attitudes and behavior of society in the mosquito eradication.

2. Methods

This research used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional study. The data were obtained from questionnaires and interviews with respondents consisting of individual characteristics, to know the level of knowledge, to find out attitudes and to see the behavior of respondents to the mosquito eradication.

The research was done in Suka Damai Village, Rimbo Ulu Sub-district, Tebo District on May 2011. The population was all householders in the Suka Damai Village. The sample selection was done by multistage sampling, resulting in 110 householders.

3. Results

Overview location research

Suka Damai village is located in the district Tebo Ulu, Rimbo, Jambi Province. Suka Damai Village shares borders with Sido Rukun in the northt Wana Reja in the east, Suka Maju in the south, and Sungai Pandan in the west; having 38.60 Km2 of area, 8 hectares of paddy fields, and 3.852 ha of dry land. There are 6,892 lives in the village with 1,757 of them are householders.

Distribution of educational level Suka Damai Village residents had a largely 9-year primary education in 2008/2009, namely the high-school education as many as 474 people, as many as 296 junior high and elementary school as much as 874 people.

Overview of the practice of respondents toward the mosquito eradication level of education, level of knowledge about DHF, level of expertise and attitudes toward the mosquito eradication can seen in Table 1.

Table 1

Distribution of behavior of respondents toward, level of education, level of knowledge about dhf, level of knowledge and attitudes toward the mosquito eradication in Suka Damai Village Rimbo Ulu Subdistrict in 2011.


Dependent Variable Frequency %
Behavior in the mosquito eradication
Implement Not Available Standard 52 47.3
Implement Compliance with standards 58 52.7
Total 110 100
Independent Variable
Level of education
High 51 46.4
Low 59 53.6
Total 110 100
Level of knowledge about DHF
Good 62 56.4
Not Good 48 43.6
Total 110 100
Level of knowledge about the mosquito eradication
Good 76 69.1
Not Good 34 30.9
Total 110 100
Attitudes toward the mosquito eradication
Positive 45 40.9
Negative 65 59.1
Total 110 100

The proportion of respondents who had a higher education by implement behavioral the mosquito eradication according to the standard was 62.7%. The proportion of the level of knowledge about DHF, the level of expertise about the mosquito eradication and attitudes toward the mosquito eradication with the behavior of respondents toward the mosquito eradication can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2

Distribution of respondents according to the level of education, knowledge about DHF, knowledge of the mosquito eradication, attitudes about the mosquito eradication and behavior of respondents towards the mosquito eradication in Suka Damai village, Rimbo Ulu Sub district in 2011.


<The Behavior of respondents toward the mosquito eradication Amount p OR (95% CI)
Implement Not Available Standard Implement Compliance with standards
Level of Education 0. Low 33 26 59
55.90% 44.1% 100%
1. High 19 32 51
37.3% 62.7% 100% 0.078 2.14 (0.99-4.59)
Total 52 58 110
47.3% 52.7% 100%
Level of Knowledge about DHF 0. Not Good 32 16 48
66.7% 33.3% 100%
1. Good 20 42 62
32.3% 67.7% 100% 0.001 4.2 (1.88-9.37)
Total 52 58 110
47.3% 52.7% 100%
Level of Knowledge about the mosquito eradication 0. Not Good 27 7 34
79.4% 20.6% 100%
1. Good 25 51 76
32.90 67.1% 100% 0.001 7.87 (3.02-20.53)
Total 52 58 110
47.3% 52.7% 100%
Attitudes 0. Negative 50 15 65
76.9% 23.1% 100%
1. Positive 2 43 45
4.4% 95.6% 100 0.001 71.67 (15.51-331.19)
Total 52 58 110
47.3% 52.7% 100%

4. Discussions

The behavior of respondents in the mosquito eradication

The behavior in this research referred to actions or activities of householde related to the mosquito eradication. Measurement behavior used a questionnaire.

The behavior of respondents in to the mosquito eradication with the category which carried out to standard obtained the result was 52.7%.

Level of education

The level of education consisted of not joing or not graduated and graduated from elementary school; not graduated and graduated from junior high school; not graduated and graduated from high school, and not graduated and graduated from college. Low education level was slightly higher than the higher education (53.6%).

The results of Chi-Square test obtained p-value = 0.0078; showing there was no difference in the proportion of respondents behavior who carried out the appropriate of standard in the mosquito eradication among high educated respondents with educated.

Knowledge about dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF)

The questions used was whether the respondents ever had heard/known the dengue disease, the source of health information about dengue hemorrhagic fever, signs/symptoms of dengue fever, the season when DHF usually accured, the type of mosquitoes that transmit dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever, a mosquito bite, the mosquito breeding, the easiest and the most accurate tool eradicate dengue mosquito nest.

Based on the categorization conducted to nine variables question, it showed that 62 respondents (56.4%) had a good knowledge of dengue hemorrhagic fever.

It showed that there was a correlation between the relationship and knowledge about dengue hemorrhagic fever with people's behavior in to the mosquito eradication (p = 0.001).

Knowledge about to the mosquito eradication

Knowledge of the mosquito eradication was variables analyzed to know the extent of understanding of to the mosquito eradication both regarding execution time and the type of activities.

Based on the categorization is based on five questions related to respondents' awareness of to the mosquito eradication, showed 76 respondents (69.1%) had good knowledge of the mosquito eradication.

The results of statistical test Chi-square obtained the p-value =0,000, showing that there was a significant relationship between the level of knowledge and the behavior of respondents in the mosquito eradication.

Attitudes to to the mosquito eradication

After categorized, it was obtained the conclusion that from 110 respondents, 45 respondents (40.9%) were more favorable to the mosquito eradication the mosquito eradication, shown by that they were agree/very agree with the program to the mosquito eradication and the importance of public participation.

Statistically, there was a relationship between attitudes and the behavior in the mosquito eradication (p = 0.00).

5. Conclusions and Suggestions

There was no correlation between level of education and communities's behavior in to the mosquito eradication; there was a relationship between the level of knowledge about dengue hemorrhagic fever with communities' behavior in to the mosquito eradication; There was a relationship between the level of knowledge about to the mosquito eradication and people's behavior in to the mosquito eradication; there was a relationship between attitudes and communities' behavior in the mosquito eradication.

It's expected that the community in the Suka Damai village to get more active to get involved in the mosquito eradication such as getting more information and education about the mosquito eradication, participating as volunteer in the program. For local government, it's expected to make policy such as providing counseling and youth meetin about the program.

References

1 

Anggraeni,D,S. 2010.Stop! Demam Berdarah Dengue.Jakarta:Penerbit Citra Insan Madani.

2 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2008. Laporan Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) Indonesia-Tahun 2007. Jakarta: Depkes RI.

3 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2007. Pemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk Demam Berdarah Dengue (PSN DBD) Oleh Juru Pemantau Jentik(Jumantik). Jakarta: Depkes RI.

4 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2007. Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Demam Berdarah Dengue Di Indonesia.Jakarta: Dirjen Pp&Pl.

5 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2004.Kebijaksanaan Program P2- Dbd Dan Situasi Terkini Dbd Indonesia. Jakarta: Depkes RI.

6 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2003. Panduan: ProgramPeningkatan Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Pemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk Demam Berdarah Dengue (PSN DBD) Di Kabupaten/Kota.Jakarta: Depkes RI.

7 

Departeman Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 1996. Modul Latihan KaderdalamPemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk Demam Berdarah (PSN-DBD).Jakarta: Depkes RI.

8 

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 1996. Petunjuk TeknisPemberanatasan Nyamuk Penular Penyakit Demam Berdarah Dengue.Jakarta:Depkes RI.

9 

Departeman Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 1995. Membina GerakanPemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk Demam Berdarah Dengue (PSN-DBD).Jakarta: Depkes RI.

10 

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi. 2010. Data Program Pemberantasan PenyakitDBD Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2009.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi.

11 

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi. 2009. Data Program Pemberantasan PenyakitDBD Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2008.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi.

12 

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi. 2008. Data Program Pemberantasan PenyakitDBD Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2007.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jambi.

13 

Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo. 2010. Data Program Pemberantasan Penyakit DBD Kabupaten Tebo Tahun 2009.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo.

14 

Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo. 2009. Data Program PemberantasanPenyakit DBD Kabupaten Tebo Tahun 2008.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo.

15 

Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo. 2008. Data Program PemberantasanPenyakit DBD Kabupaten Tebo Tahun 2007.Tebo: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tebo.

16 

Direktorat Jenderal P2PL. 2010.Laporan Perkembangan KasusDBDdan Chikungunya Sampai Dengan 9 Februari 2010.Jakarta: Kemenkes RI

17 

Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang IX. 2010. Data Program Pemberantasan Penyakit DBDKecamatan Rimbo Ulu Tahun 2009. Rimbo Ulu: Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang IX.

18 

Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang Ix. 2009. Data Program Pemberantasan Penyakit DBDKecamatan Rimbo Ulu Tahun 2008. Rimbo Ulu: Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang Ix.

19 

Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang IX. 2008. Data Program Pemberantasan Penyakit DBDKecamatan Rimbo Ulu Tahun 2007. Rimbo Ulu: Puskesmas Rimbo Bujang IX.

20 

WHO. 2001.Pencegahan Dan Pengendalian Dengue dan Demam Berdarah Dengue: Panduan Lengkap.(Palupi Widyastuti,Skm). Jakarta:Egc.

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 5
  • Views 11

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 2413-0877