Cost Benefit Analysis of Residual Risk Control in General Engineering Department of PT PAL Indonesia (Persero)
Abstract
One cause of the low impact of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) on the industry is the implementation due to cost, not as an implementation to save workplace accident. Because of that, we need a method to assess the implementation of OSH not only about cost, but also the benefit. One of the method that can be used is Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). The objective of this research was to analysis CBA of residual risk in the Division of General Engineering of PT. PAL Indonesia (Persero) and provide the most favorable residual risk control based on CBA. The method was descriptive research. The result showed that the Division of General Engineering had been doing risk management starting from hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control but still leaves residual risk that cause potential workplace accidents. Based on CBA, it showed that the three residual risk control programs, namely, OSH training, personal protective equipment (PPE) supply, and 5S implementation had NPV > 0 (positive) and B/C Ratio > 1. But, the highest B/C Ratio by 5S implementation. So, it can be concluded that the 5S implementation gives more advantages than the other options.
Keywords: cost benefit analysis, occupational safety and health economy, residual risk control
References
[1] Ketenagakerjaan, B. P. J. S. (2016). Jumlah Kecelakaan Kerja di Indonesia Masih Tinggi. Retrieved form http://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/berita/5769/ Jumlah-kecelakaan-kerja-di- Indonesiamasih-tinggi.html (accessed on 4 March 2017).
[2] Kurnianto, R. Y. (2012). Gambaran Tindakan Bahaya (Unsafe Action) dan Kondisi Bahaya (Unsafe Condition) Pada Area Banbury 5 dan 7 di PT Multistrada Arah Sarana Tbk. Magang. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
[3] Dyan, M. (2014). Studi Tentang Perilaku Tidak Aman di PT Bangun Sarana Baja Gresik. Magang. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
[4] Mok, C. K., Tummala, V. M. R., and Leung, H. M. (1997). Practices, barriers, and benefits of risk management process in building services cost estimation. Construction Management and Economics, vol. 15, pp. 161–175.
[5] Tualeka, A. R. (2015). Analisis Risiko (Risk Assesment, Risk Management & Risk Communication di Lingkungan Kerja). Surabaya: Bumi Lestari.
[6] Hrymak, V., dan Perezgonalez, J. D. (2007). The Cost and Effects of Workplace Accidents: Twenty Case Studies from Ireland (Health and Safety Authority Research Series 02/2007). Retrieved from http://www.hsa.ie/eng/Publications_and_Forms/Publications/ Research_Publications/The_costs_and_effects_of_workplace_accidents_- _Twenty_case_studies_from_Ireland.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2017).
[7] Tarwaka. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Keselamatan Kerja Serta Pencegahan Kecelakaan di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta: Harapan Press.
[8] Hadipoetro, S. (2014). Manajemen Komperehensif Keselamatan Kerja. Jakarta: Yayasan Patra tarbiaah Nusantara.
[9] Cohen, A. and dan Colligan, M. J. (1998). Assessing Occupational Safety and Health Training: A Literature Review. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/98- 145/pdfs/98-145.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2017).
[10] Sholihah, Q. (2011). Good Housekeeping: Konsep dan Implementasi 5S. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.