An Application of RapAgRisk (Rapid Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Assessment) Method on Fresh Vegetables for Identifying and Reducing Damage during Delivery to Consumers

Abstract

Vegetables have distinctive properties that are easily damaged, so handling and delivery time will be the important factors in the whole supply chain. Identification and mitigation of the damage is very important to prevent damage to vegetables and maintain resale value. This study uses the Rapid Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Assessment (RapAgRisk) based on the risk management standard ISO 31000:2009 to conduct a risk analysis. The field research uses sample of the actors in the supply chain from the farm producer to the point of sale. The research was done by taking convenience sampling through in-depth interviews with the actors of the supply chain. The research location in fresh vegetable production centers in Magelang (Central Java Province), and Sleman (Yogyakarta Province). Research result showed risk factor of the weather, natural condition, biological and environmental, related markets, logistics (infrastructure), and operational management in the supply chain of fresh vegetables. At the level of farmers and collectors, each have four risks while at the merchant level, there are five important risks getting attention for follow up. Mitigation each of these factors lead to the reducing damage and it can be applied to maintain the quality of the vegetables and increase the selling price.

 

Keywords: Fresh vegetables; RapAgRisk; Risk management; Risk mitigation; Supply chain

References
[1] Directorate General of Horticulture. 2015. The production of vegetable in Indonesia. (http://www.pertanian.go.id/ap_pages/mod/datahorti). Accessed on November, 2015

[2] Guritno, A. D. 2014. Assessment of the Supply Chain Factors and Classification of Inventory Management in Suppliers’ Level. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. Vol. 3: 51- 55.

[3] Guritno, A.D. 2015. Supply Chain Risk Management: An Approach to Reduce the Agricultural Product’s Logistics Costs. KNE Life Science. International Conference on Agroindustry, Vol. 2: 6-11.

[4] Jaffee, S., Siegel, P and Andrews, C. 2010. Rapid Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Framework. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank.

[5] Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource. 2014. Mount Merapi. (http://www. vsi.esdm.go.id/index.php/gunungapi/data-dasar-gunungapi/542-g-merapi? start=1). Accessed on November 2, 2016.

[6] Pishvae, M.S., H. Basiri and M.S. Sajadieh. 2009. Supply Chain and Logistics in National, International and Governmental Environment. National Logistic Costs. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.

[7] Purdy, G. 2010. ISO 31000:2009. Setting A New Standard for Risk Management. Risk Analysis, Vol. 30 No.6: 881-886

[8] Waters, D. 2007. Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistic. London. The Chartered Institute of Logistic and Transportation.