Download fulltext HTML
Nurhajati, T., Soepranianondo, K., Lokapirnasari, W. P., & Sahidu, A. M. (2017). Identification and Characterization Indigenous of Lactobacillus spfrom Bovine Rumen Fluidof Slaughterhouse. KnE Life Sciences, 3(6), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v3i6.1182

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v3i6.1182

statistics

  • 216 Abstract Views
  • 279 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Tri Nurhajati

    Tri Nurhajati

    Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya
  • Koesnoto Soepranianondo

    Koesnoto Soepranianondo

    Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya
  • Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari

    Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari

    Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya
  • Adriana Monica Sahidu

    Adriana Monica Sahidu

    Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Airlangga University, Surabaya

Published Date

  • Dec 3, 2017

Identification and Characterization Indigenous of Lactobacillus spfrom Bovine Rumen Fluidof Slaughterhouse

KnE Life Sciences / The Veterinary Medicine International Conference (VMIC) / Pages 549-556

Abstract

The discovery and characterisation of indigenous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important for diversity microbes as candidate probiotic. This research was aimed to identify lactic acid bacteria isolate from isolation process of local bovine rumen fluid from slaughterhouse in Surabaya Indonesia. Genotypic testing was conducted by analyzing 16S rDNA and biochemical identification. DNA of sample isolate was isolated and then amplified in vitro through the PCR method. Determination of nucleotide sequence of 16S rDNA was performed with sequencing method. The result of nucleotide sequence was than compared with GenBank database. The BLAST was then applied to identify the phylogenetic tree. Based on the biochemical characterization and nucleotide sequences, that isolate was identified as Lactobacillus rhamnosus subsp TG15. The result of this research showed that L.rhamnosus subsp TG15 showed viability bacteria in MRSA as control as much as 1.1 x 108 CFU/ml, mean while in MRSA pH 2, L.rhamnosus subsp TG15 showed its viability as much as 9.3 x 106 CFU/ml. Viability of isolate on bile tolerance 0.3% was 2.4 x 107 CFU/ml). Index antagonist bacteria test on S.aureus showed inhibition diameter as much as 2.0 mm and in antagonist test on E.coli as much as 2.5 mm. Based on the result, it could be concluded that this research found a new strain of lactic acid bacteria, L.rhamnosus subsp TG15 and that isolate has ability as the probiotic candidate.

 

Keywords: L.rhamnosus subsp TG15; survival on acidity; bile salts; S.aureus and E.coli

References
[1] H.Paul, A. P. M. Antunes, A. D. Covington, P. Evans and P. S. Phillips,. In: The 28th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management. (2013) Philadelphia.

[2] G. G.Syngai, R.Gopi, R.Bharali, S.Dey, G. A.Lakshmanan and G.Ahmed. J.of food science and technology., 53(2) (2016)921-933.

[3] M. Boirivant and W.Strober. Current opinion in gastroenterology, 23(6) (2007)679-692.

[4] M de Vrese and J.Schrezenmeir, In Food biotechnology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (2008)1-66.

[5] M. L.Dongarrà, V.Rizzello, L.Muccio, W.Fries, A.Cascio, I.Bonaccorsi and G.Ferlazzo, Current allergy and asthma reports, 13(1) (2013)19-26.

[6] E.Muñoz-Atienza, B.Gómez-Sala, C.Araújo, C.Campanero, R.Del Campo, P. E.Hernández, C. Herranz and L. M.Cintas,. BMC microbiology, 13(1) (2013)1.

[7] A. A.Amara and A.Shibl, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23(2) (2015)107-114.

[8] M. de Vrese, and J. Schrezenmeir, In Food biotechnology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (2008)1-66.

[9] C. N.Vuong, W. K.Chou, B. M.Hargis, L. R.Berghman and L. R.Bielke. International Journal of Probiotics & Prebiotics, 11(1) (2016).

[10] Y.Cai, H.Pang, Z.Tan, Y.Wang, J.Zhang, Xu and Y.Cao. In Lactic Acid Bacteria (2014)443-491. Springer Netherlands.

[11] A.Corsetti and L.Settanni. Food Research International, 40(5)(2007)539-558.

[12] F.M.Ausubel, R.Brent, R.E.Kingston, D.D.,Mppre, J.G.Seldman, J.A.Smith and K Struhl,. 1992. Short Protocols in Moleculer Biology. 2nd ed. John Willey & Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.

[13] L.S Chou dan B. Weimer. . Journal Diary Science. 82(1999)23-31.

[14] L.Z.Jin, Y.W. Ho, M.A. Ali, N. Abdullah, and S. Jalaludin. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81: 201-206(1996).

[15] S. Huang, P. Sheng and H. Hongyu Zhang. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 13(2012)2563-2577.

[16] C. Fan, S.Li, C. Li, S. Ma, L. Zou and Q. Wu. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao, 52(9)(2012)1113-21.

[17] M.Bernardeau, J.P. Vernoux, S.H. Dubernet, and M. Guéguen. Int. J. of Food Micro. 126: 278-285(2008)

[18] M. B.Massi, F. Vitali, D. Federici, P.Matteuzzi, Brigidi. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 96(2004)777–786.

[19] C.Ceapa, J.Lambert, K.van Limpt, M.Wels, T.Smokvina, J.Knol and M.Kleerebezem. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, (2015)00851.

[20] E.Hawaz. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 8(2014)1419-1425.

[21] H.Musikasang, 2008.Master Thesis, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

[22] K.Puphan, P.Sornplang, S.Uriyapongson and C.Navanukraw, Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14(8)(2015)474.

[23] D.Fayol-Messaoudi, C. N.Berger, M. H.Coconnier-Polter, V.Lievin-Le Moal and A. L. Servin. Applied and environmental microbiology, 71(10)(2005)6008-6013.

[24] V.Lievin, I.Peiffer, S.Hudault, F. Rochat, D.Brassart, J. R.Neeser and A. L.Servin. Gut, 47(5)(2000)646-652.

[25] M.Ogawa, K.Shimizu, K.Nomoto, R. Tanaka, T.Hamabata, S.Yamasaki, T.Takeda and

Y.Takeda, International journal of food microbiology, 68(1)(2001)135-140.

[26] C. L.Ohland and W. K. MacNaughton. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 298(6) (2010)G807-G819.

[27] H.M.Blottière, B.Buecher, J.P.Galmiche and C. Cherbut. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62(01) (2003)101-106.

[28] Y.K. Lee and S. Salminen.. Handbook of Probiotics and Prebiotics, 2nd ed. A John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Publication New York, USA, 2009.