Download fulltext HTML
Ferdiansyah, F., Utomo, D. N., & Suroto, H. (2017). Immunogenicity of Bone Graft Using Xenograft Freeze-Dried Cortical Bovine, Allograft Freeze-Dried Cortical New Zealand White Rabbit, Xenograft Hydroxyapatite Bovine, And Xenograft Demineralized Bone Matrix Bovine In Bone Defect Of Femoral Diaphysis White Rabbit Experimental Study In Vivo. KnE Life Sciences, 3(6), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v3i6.1143

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v3i6.1143

statistics

  • 778 Abstract Views
  • 536 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Ferdiansyah Ferdiansyah
    No author data available.
  • Dwikora Novembri Utomo
    No author data available.
  • Heri Suroto
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Dec 3, 2017

Immunogenicity of Bone Graft Using Xenograft Freeze-Dried Cortical Bovine, Allograft Freeze-Dried Cortical New Zealand White Rabbit, Xenograft Hydroxyapatite Bovine, And Xenograft Demineralized Bone Matrix Bovine In Bone Defect Of Femoral Diaphysis White Rabbit Experimental Study In Vivo

KnE Life Sciences / The Veterinary Medicine International Conference (VMIC) / Pages 344-355

Abstract

Bone defect remains a big challenge for orthopedic surgeon. Bone grafting nowadays become the second common transplantation after blood transfusion. Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard in treatment of bone defect, but it’s source limitation and donor site morbidity makes some surgeon were looking for allograft or xenograft. There are some issues with allo- and xenograft about difficulty in corporation and rejection reaction. This study explores the immunogenicity of allograft and xenograft.

 

Keyword :  freeze-dried xenograft, freeze-dried allograft, hydroxyapatite xenograft, demineralized bone matrix xenograft.

References
1. Dimitriou R. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. Dimitriou et al. BMC Medicine. 2011; 9(66): p. 3-10.

2. Heo SY. Biomechanical assessment of freeze-dried allograft cortical bone plate graft in canine bone defect model. Veterinarni Medicina. 2009; 54: p. 183-190.

3. Irene Mencía Castaño CMCGPDFJO. Next generation bone tissue engineering: non-viral miR- 133a inhibition using collagen-nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds rapidly enhances osteogenesis. Scientific report. 2016 June 14; 6: p. 1-10.

4. Brydone AS. Bone grafting, orthopaedics biomaterial, and the clinical need for bone engineering. J Engineering in Medicine. 2010 Agustus 12; 224: p. 1329-1343.

5. Munthe RV. Evaluasi hasil rekonstruksi defek tulang besar dengan massive bone allograft. Retrospective Study. Surabaya: University of Airlangga, Orthopaedy and Traumatology; 2013.

6. Chad M. Autogenous Bone Graft: Donor Sites and Techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: p. 2227-36.

7. Greenwald AS. Bone-Graft Substitutes: Facts, Fictions & Aplications. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: p. 98-103.

8. Nandi SK. Orthopaedic applications bone graft & graft substitutes: a riview. Indian J Med Res. 2010 July; 132: p. 15-30.

9. J.P. Gleeson NAPaFJO. Addition of Hydroxyapatite Improves Stiffness Interconnectivity and Osteogenic Potential of a Highly Porous Collagen-Based Scaffold for Bone Tissue Regeneration. European Cells and Materials. 2010; 20: p. 218-230.

10. Hamid Shegarfi OR. Review Article: Bone transplantation and immune response. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2009 August; 17(2): p. 206-211.

11. Hung NN. Basic Knowledge of Bone Grafting. In Zorzi A. Bone Grafting. Croatia: InTech, Chapters; 2012. p. 11-38.

12. Cornu O. Influence of Freeze-Drying and Irradiation on Mechanical Properties of Human Cancellous Bone: Application to Impaction Bone Grafting. In Zorzi A. Bone Grafting. Croatia: InTech; 2012. p. 41-58.

13. Kinney RC. Demineralized Bone Matrix for Fracture Healing: Fact or Fiction?. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 March; 24(3): p. 52-55.

14. Walsh MC KNYJSJa. Osteoimmunology: Interplay Between the Immune System and Bone Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Immuno. 2006 October 12; I(24): p. 33-63.

15. Heiple KG CSHC. A comparative study of the healing process following different types of bone transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963; 45: p. 1593–616.

16. Afzali B LRHFM. Allorecognition and the Alloresponse: Clinical Implications. Tissue Antigens. 2007 March;(69): p. 545–56.

17. Reikeras O SHNCRFRB. Impact of MHC mismatch and freezing on bone graft incorporation: an experimental study in rats. J Orthop Res. 2008; 26: p. 925-31.

18. Ludwig SC BS. Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion: a basic science summary. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: p. 635-45.

19. David Easter. Practical Considerations for Biologic Scaffolds. In Jacobsen G, editor. Allograft vs.Xenograft. San Diego: University of California; 2009. p. 2-13.

20. Aliabadi A. Evaluation of the effects of bovine demineralized bone matrix and coralline hydroxyapatite on radial fracture healing in rabbit. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology. 2012 April 15; 6(7): p. 109-114.

21. Dumitrescu AL. Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes in Periodontal Therapy. In Dumitrescu AL, editor. Chemicals in Surgical Periodontal Therapy. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 73-144.

22. John Street ea. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates bone repair by promoting angiogenesis and bone turnover. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002 July 23; 99(15): p. 9656-9661.

23. Brandon Beamer B&CHMM&JLM. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: An Essential Component of Angiogenesis and Fracture Healing. Hospital for Special Surgery Journal. 2010; 6: p. 85-94.

24. Santic V. Treatment of Tibial Bone Defect with Rotational Vascular Periosteal Graft in Rabbits. Coll. Antropol. 2008 February 8; 33(1): p. 43-50.

25. Bowen JA MJGJTH. Comparison of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft and porous particulate hydroxyapatite in human periodontal osseous defects. Journal Periodontal. 1989 December; 60(12): p. 647-654.