The Unified Theory Acceptance and Use of Technology in the Industrial Internet of Things Era: A Conceptual Framework
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to build a conceptual framework based on literature review that will be tested in future research related to Digital Business. The results of the literature review allow for the construction of hypotheses into a conceptual framework. Furthermore, the study assesses the influence of performance expectations, efforts expectations and social influence on behavioral intention and usage behavior by modifying Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. The conceptual framework will be tested among Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) users for future research in Indonesia.
Keywords: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, behavioral intention, use behavior, UTAUT, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, Industrial IoT
References
1] Abushakra, A., and Nikbin, D. (2019). Extending the UTAUT2 Model to Understand the Entrepreneur Acceptance and Adopting Internet of Things (IoT). Knowledge Management in Organizations, pp. 339–347, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_29.
[2] Abdul-Gader, A. H. (1997). Information systems strategies for multinational companies in Arab Gulf countries. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 3-12.
[3] Abu, F., Jabar, J. and Yunus, A. R (2015). Modified of UTAUT Theory in Adaption of Technology for Malaysia Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Food Industry. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 9, issue 4, pp. 104-109.
[4] Al-Momani, A. M., Mahmoud, M. A. and Ahmad, M. S. (2018). Factors that Influence the Acceptance of Internet of Things Services by Customers of Telecommunication Companies in Jordan. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, vol. 30, issue 4, pp. 51–63, DOI:10.4018/joeuc.2018100104.
[5] Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 185-204.
[6] Coughlan, T., et al. (2012). Exploring Acceptance and Consequences of the Internet of Things in the Home. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. Retrieved from doi:10.1109/greencom.2012.32.
[7] Dapas, C. C., Sitorus, T. and Purwanto, E. (2019), The Effect of Service Quality and Website Quality of Zalora.comon Purchase Decision as Mediated by Purchase Intention. Quality Access to Success, vol. 20, issue 169.
[8] Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. vol. 35, issue 8, pp. 982-1002.
[9] Flyden, P. and Haglund, K. (2018). Key Determinants for user Intention Toadopt Smart Home Ecosystems. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1233029/FULLTEXT02.
[10] Gao, L. and Bai, X. (2014). A Unified Perspective on the Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Internet of Things Technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 26, issue 2, pp. 211-231, https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061.
[11] Handi, H., et al. (2018). The Effect of E-WOM and Perceived Value on the Purchase Decision of Foods by Using the Go-Food Application as Mediated by Trust. Quality Innovation Prosperity, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 112-127.
[12] Hartarto, A. (2018). Making Indonesia 4.0. Retrieved September 25, 2019 from https://www.kemenperin. go.id/download/18384.
[13] Hasan, H. and Ditsa, G. (1999). The Impact of Culture on the Adoption of IT: An Interpretive Study. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 5-15.
[14] Hill, C. E. L., K.D., Straub, D. and El-Sheshai, K. A. (1998). Qualitative Assessment of Arab Culture and Information Technology Transfer. Journal of Global Information Management ( JGIM), vol. 6, issue 3, pp. 29-38.
[15] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[16] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010). Culture and Organizations - Software of The Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival (3rd ed.). Mc. Graw-Hill.
[17] Huang, K-Y., Choi, N. and Chengalur-Smith, I. (2010, August). Cultural Dimensions as Moderators of the UTAUT Model: A Research Proposal in a Healthcare Context. Presented at Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru.
[18] Hummelink, I. (2016). Acceptance of Internet of Things applications In Office Buildings: A Value Sensitive Design study on the acceptance of energy reducing innovations in governmental office building. (Master Thesis, 2016).
[19] Kim, K. and Shin, D. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches. Internet Research, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 527-541, https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126.
[20] Kowatsch, T. and Maass, W. (2012). Critical Privacy Factors of Internet of Things Services: An Empirical Investigation with Domain Experts. Knowledge and Technologies in Innovative Information Systems, pp. 200–211, DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 642-33244-9_14.
[21] Nistor, N., et al. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 45, issue 1, pp. 36–55, DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01383.x.
[22] Okano, M. T. (2017, September). IOT and Industry 4.0: The Industrial New Revolution. Presented at International Conference on Management and Information Systems. vol. 25, p. 26.
[23] Purwanto, E. (2018). Moderation Effects of Power Distance on The Relationship Between Job Characteristics, Leadership Empowerment, Employee Participation and Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Framework. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, volume 17, issue 1.
[24] Rajput, S. and Singh, S. (2019). Identifying Industry 4.0 IoT enablers by integrated PCA-ISM-DEMATEL approach. Management Decision, vol. 57, issue 8, pp. 1784-1817, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0378.
[25] Phichitchaisopa and Naenna. (2013). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Healthcare Information Technology. EXCLI Journal, vol. 12, pp. 413-436.
[26] Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business.
[27] Sriwindono, H. and Yahya, S. (2012). The Influence of Cultural Dimension on ICT Acceptance in Indonesia Higher Learning Institution. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, issue 5, pp. 215-225.
[28] Straub, D. W. (1994). The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S. Information Systems Research, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 23–47. DOI: 10.1287/isre.5.1.23.
[29] Tarhini, A., et al. (2017). Examining the Moderating Effect of Individual-Level Cultural Values on Users’ Acceptance of E-learning in Developing Countries: A Structural Equation Modeling of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 25, issue 3, pp. 306-328, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635.
[30] Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 9). New York: Academic Press, pp. 271-360.
[31] Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, vol. 45, issue 2, pp. 186-204.
[32] Venkatesh, V., et al. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, issue 3, pp. 425-478, DOI: 10.2307/30036540