KnE Energy | The 3rd International Conference on Particle Physics and Astrophysics (ICPPA) | pages: 234–246

, , , and

1. Introduction

The dynamics of the early universe in terms of the 'Big Bang' may be studied experimentally by relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions from Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) to Large-Hadron-Collider (LHC) energies in terms of 'tiny bangs' in the laboratory. With sufficiently strong parton interactions, the medium in the collision zone can be expected to achieve local equilibrium after some initial delay and exhibit approximately hydrodynamic flow [1,2,3]. In these collisions a new state of strongly interacting matter is created, being characterized by a very low shear viscosity η to entropy density s ratio, η/s , close to a nearly perfect fluid [4,5]. Lattice QCD (lQCD) calculations [6,7] indicate that a crossover region between hadron and quark-gluon matter should have been reached in these experiments (at least at higher energies). Apart from a deconfinement transition also a restoration of chiral symmetry should occur at about the same critical temperature in case of vanishing baryon chemical potential. Whereas at low chemical potential the transition is known to be a crossover [8,9] it is presently unclear if there will be a critical point in the QCD phase diagram marking the transition to a first-order domain [10]. Furthermore, it is doubted that the restoration of chiral symmetry and the deconfinement transition will happen at the same point in the phase diagram once high baryon chemical potentials are encountered [11,12,13]. This situation will be met experimentally in heavy-ion collisions at FAIR/NICA energies in the future [14].

Since the hot and dense matter produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions appears only for a couple of fm/c, it is a challenge for experiment to investigate its properties. The differential spectra of hadrons with light quarks/antiquarks provide information about the bulk dynamics whereas abundances and differential spectra of hadrons with strange/antistrange quarks shed light on the chemical equilibration processes. Furthermore, the electromagnetic emissivity of the matter produced in heavy-ion collisions is tested by direct photon spectra as well as dileptons which might provide additional information on the properties of vector resonances in a dense hadronic medium. Also the heavy flavor mesons are considered to be promising probes since the production of heavy flavor requires a large energy-momentum transfer and takes place early in the heavy-ion collisions, and - due to the large energy-momentum transfer - should be described by perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD). The produced heavy flavor then interacts with the hot dense matter (of partonic or hadronic nature) by exchanging energy and momentum which is controlled by a spatial diffusion constant Ds(T,μB) . Let's have a brief look at the various model concepts.

2. Statistical, macroscopic and microscopic models

Hadron resonance gas (HRG) or statistical models

In case of very strong interactions of the degrees of freedom in the collision zone of relativistic heavy-ion collisions one might infer that a thermal and chemical equilibrium has been achieved (at least at freezeout) and the final hadronic spectra can be described by a grand-canonical ensemble assuming the conservation of energy, particle number and volume on average. When looking at particle ratios the volume drops out - implying similar freezeout conditions and collective flow for all hadrons - and one is left with essentially two Lagrange parameters that are attributed to a temperature T and baryon chemical potential μB . Thus - looking at central collisions of Au+Au (Pb+Pb) - one can extract a freezeout line in the QCD phase diagram by fitting the measured particle ratios (dominantly at midrapidity) at different bombarding energies. In fact, the results of such fits are in a good agreement with experimental observation from AGS to top LHC energies [15,16] over many orders of magnitude once some parameter for the excluded volume of hadrons ( r0 0.3 fm) is choosen properly in order to reduce the net density. Especially at top LHC energies only a single parameter T survives since μB 0. In principle the inclusion of resonances is akin to an interacting theory of 'fundamental' hadrons with attractive interactions; the concept of an excluded volume decreases the density and increases the pressure thus simulating additional repulsive interactions. These models are reminiscent of Van der Waals gases and recent statistical models actually are formulated along this line or incorporate explicit baryon-baryon interactions [17,18,19]. Accordingly, the formulation of interacting hadron resonance gas models (IHRG) will provide a link between the actual interaction parameters and fundamental many-body theories (e.g. Brueckner) or S -matrix approaches.

However, the question about the dynamics of equilibration and the generation of collective flow in heavy-ion collisions remains open in the HRG or IHRG approaches. Furthermore, the evaluation of photon or dilepton spectra cannot be addressed in the grandcanonical (or canonical) models since the real and virtual photons are not in equilibrium with their environment due to the low electromagnetic coupling ( αe1/137 ). Some of these questions, however, can be addressed in macroscopic models.

Hydro and hybrid models

In order to obtain some information on the space-time dynamics of heavy-ion collisions one often employs hydrodynamical models which are of one-fluid [2] or three-fluid [20] nature. In the one-fluid models the initial conditions for the hydro-evolution (at some finite time t0 assumed for local equilibration) are essentially fixed by the final hadron spectra and the generation of collective flow in the fluid follows from the local pressure gradients (adopting some equation of state (EoS) for the fluid). In this case one can model various EoS relating to a hadronic one, to lattice QCD or a model EoS with a first order phase transition in order to test the sensitivity of observables like collective flow coefficients vn ( n =1,2,3,4,..) as a function of bombarding energy and centrality of the collision. However, in ideal hydrodynamical simulations it was found that the elliptic flow as a function of transverse momentum v2(pT) was overestimated in comparison to experimental data at RHIC thus signalling a finite shear viscosity η . Actually, there is a lower limit on the ratio of shear viscosity over entropy density η/s1/(4π) [21] such that viscous hydrodynamics had to be employed [22]. Furthermore, also a finite (and even large) bulk viscosity ζ(T) for temperatures close to Tc 158 MeV should be incorporated. With the appearance of two additional transport coefficients η(T) and ζ(T) one had to specify their functional form since results from pQCD turned out to be fully misleading. On the other hand a significant triangular flow v3(pT) demonstrated the importance of initial-state fluctuations that had to be incorporated in the initial conditions of the hydro phase [23]. Furthermore, resonant hadronic scattering - after chemical freezeout - had to be included since the hadrons still keep interacting after chemical freezeout [24]. This lead to the development of hybrid models which incorporate three different type of model components:

  • i) the initial nonequilibrium phase to specify the initial state fluctuations or initial flow

  • ii) viscous hydro for the partonic (fluid) phase

  • iii) hadronic 'afterburner' for resonant interactions in the hadronic phase after freezeout.

Due to the matching of the different phases a couple of new parameters enter such models that define the matching conditions. Accordingly, a multi-parameter approach (on the scale of 15 independent parameters) emerges that has to be optimized in comparison to a multitude of experimental data in order to extract physical information on the transport coefficients. This has been done within a Bayesian analysis by a couple of authors and some proper information could be extracted so far on η/s(T) as well as for the charm diffusion coefficient Ds(T) [25,26,27]. For explicit results we refer the reader to Refs. [25,26,27][28][29][30][31]. We note in passing that within such approaches semi-central and central nucleus-nucleus collisions at ultra-relativistic energies can well be described [32] but an application to elementary high-energy p+p or π+p reactions is difficult/questionable.

In this class of models we mention also the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics (UrQMD) hybrid approach which starts with UrQMD [33] for the initial nonequilibrium phase on an event by event basis, switches to hydro after approximate equilibration in local cells of higher energy density, continues with a hydro evolution until freezeout (at equal times) and follows with UrQMD to describe the final hadronic rescatterings [34]. By construction such hybrid models may be used for lower (AGS) energies as well as for ultra-relativistic (LHC) energies. A systematic study of transport properties in the fluid phase is still not available so far. Further attempts incorporating a color glass condensate (CGC) for the initial conditions, IP-glasma or EPOS2 initial conditions [35,36,37,38,39,40,41] provide also a good description of the collective flows as a function of bombarding energy and collision centrality at RHIC and LHC energies.

A further advantage of hydro or hybrid models is that one can calculate the differential photon and dilepton production by integration of microscopic production rates in space and time [42,43]. Especially in the partonic phase the AMY rates [44] are employed for photon production by most of the authors whereas the evolution of the electromagnetic emissivity in the hadronic phase differs substantially within the different variants.

Microscopic transport models

Whereas early microscopic transport models have been developed for the dynamics of hadrons employing a nuclear matter EoS and cross sections based on experimental data or effective hadronic Lagrangians [45,46,47] later versions have included the formation and decay of strings [33,48,49] to incorporate multi-particle production with increasing energy which becomes essential at AGS and SPS energies. However, when applied to heavy-ion collisions at RHIC energies a couple of problems emerged since a number of observables (elliptic flow of charged hadrons, transverse mass spectra of hadrons, intermediate mass dileptons etc.) could no longer be properly described by hadron-string degrees of freedom [50,51]. This lead to the formulation of transport models for partonic degrees of freedom of Boltzmann-type that were first based on pQCD based cross sections [52,53] with an ideal gas EoS for the partonic phase. Since pQCD scattering cross sections between massless partons turned out too low in order to describe the elliptic flow of hadrons measured experimentally, either effective (enhanced) two-body cross sections have been used [54] or additional 23 channels have been added as in BAMPS [53]. The formation of hadrons is usually performed by coalescence either in momentum space or - more recently - in phase space. Another branch of transport models is based on NJL-like approaches including a coupling to a scalar mean field and/or a vector mean field [55,56]. In these models the partons have a finite dynamical mass and the binary cross sections are either extracted from the NJL Lagrangian [56] or parameterized to simulate a finite η/s (as in hydro models) [57]. All these approaches provide a reasonable description of experimental data at RHIC energies as well as for LHC energies.

The Parton-Hadron-String Dynamics (PHSD) transport approach [58,59] is a microscopic covariant dynamical model for strongly interacting systems formulated on the basis of Kadanoff-Baym equations [60] for Green's functions in phase-space representation (in first order gradient expansion beyond the quasiparticle approximation). The approach consistently describes the full evolution of a relativistic heavy-ion collision from the initial hard scatterings and string formation through the dynamical deconfinement phase transition to the strongly-interacting quark-gluon plasma (sQGP) as well as hadronization and the subsequent interactions in the expanding hadronic phase as in the Hadron-String-Dynamics (HSD) transport approach [48]. The transport theoretical description of quarks and gluons in the PHSD is based on the Dynamical Quasi-Particle Model (DQPM) for partons that is constructed to reproduce lQCD results for a quark-gluon plasma in thermodynamic equilibrium [60] on the basis of effective propagators for quarks and gluons. The DQPM is thermodynamically consistent and the effective parton propagators incorporate finite masses (scalar mean-fields) for gluons/quarks as well as a finite width that describes the medium dependent reaction rate. For fixed thermodynamic temperature T the partonic width's Γi(T) fix the effective two-body interactions that are presently implemented in the PHSD [61]. The PHSD differs from conventional Boltzmann approaches in a couple of essential aspects:

  • it incorporates dynamical quasi-particles due to the finite width of the spectral functions (imaginary part of the propagators) in line with complex retarded selfenergies;

  • it involves scalar mean-fields that substantially drive the collective flow in the partonic phase;

  • it is based on a realistic equation of state from lattice QCD and thus reproduces the speed of sound cs(T) reliably;

  • the hadronization is described by the fusion of off-shell partons to off-shell hadronic states (resonances or strings);

  • all conservation laws (energy-momentum, flavor currents etc.) are fulfilled in the hadronization contrary to coalescence models;

  • the effective partonic cross sections no longer are given by pQCD and are 'defined' by the DQPM in a consistent fashion. These cross sections are probed by transport coefficients (correlators) in thermodynamic equilibrium by performing PHSD calculations in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions (shear- and bulk viscosity, electric conductivity, magnetic susceptibility etc. [62,63]).

The transition from the partonic to hadronic degrees-of-freedom (for light quarks/ antiquarks) is described by covariant transition rates for the fusion of quark-antiquark pairs to mesonic resonances or three quarks (antiquarks) to baryonic states, i.e. by the dynamical hadronization [58]. Note that due to the off-shell nature of both partons and hadrons, the hadronization process described above obeys all conservation laws (i.e. four-momentum conservation and flavor current conservation) in each event, the detailed balance relations and the increase in the total entropy S . In the hadronic phase PHSD is equivalent to the hadron-strings dynamics (HSD) model [48] that has been employed in the past from SIS to SPS energies. On the other hand the PHSD approach has been tested for p+p, p+A and relativistic heavy-ion collisions from lower SPS to LHC energies and been successful in describing a large number of experimental data including single-particle spectra, collective flow [59] as well as electromagnetic probes [64] or charm observables [65,66].

Apart from deconfinement the chiral symmetry restoration (CSR) addresses another aspect of the QCD phase diagram in the ( T,μB )-plane as an additional transition between a phase with broken and a phase with restored chiral symmetry. As in case of the QCD deconfinement phase transition, the boundaries of the CSR phase transition line are not well known. Lattice QCD (lQCD) calculations show that at vanishing baryon chemical potential μB =0 the CSR takes place at roughly the same critical temperature and energy density as the deconfinement phase transition which is a crossover. At finite baryon chemical potential lQCD calculations cannot be performed due to the sign problem and one must rely on effective models (or extrapolations) in order to study the QCD phase transitions [14]. Different models support the idea that at finite chemical potential a partially restored phase is achieved before the deconfinement occurs [11,12]. In order to distinguish the two phases of such a transition, effective models use the scalar quark condensate q¯q as an order parameter. As the baryon density and temperature increase, the scalar quark condensate q¯q is expected to decrease from a non-vanishing value in the vacuum to q¯q0 which corresponds to CSR. Since q¯q is not a measurable quantity, it is crucial to determine experimental observables which are sensitive to this quantity. Since long the dilepton spectroscopy has been in the focus in this respect since in a chirally restored phase the spectral functions of the the ρ - and the a1 -meson should become identical. However, no clear evidence has been achieved so far [67]. On the other hand, the enhanced strangeness production at AGS and lower SPS energies was found to be a signature of CSR [68,69] within the PHSD approach where the local scalar quark condensate was evaluated along the line of the Hellmann-Feynman theorem from the scalar density of hadrons (cf. Ref. [69] for details).

Accordingly, microscopic transport approaches provide a bridge from p+p , to p+A and A+A collisions and allow for a transparent interpretation of differential particle spectra, collective flow and electromagnetic observables from experimental studies at various facilities and a wide energy range. Open problems are still many-body reactions - except for 2 3 channels [70,71] - and the dynamical modeling of first-order transitions in transport. The formation of clusters is still a task to be solved as well as the inclusion of chiral anomalies.

3. Transport coefficients

Information on the QCD phase diagram from strongly interacting matter does not only come from experimental studies but can also be addressed by ab initio QCD calculations on a discrete (Euklidean) space-time lattice. Due to the Fermion-sign problem direct lQCD calculations cannot be performed at finite chemical potential, however, valuable information can be inferred from lQCD calculations at imaginary chemical potentials as well as by Taylor expansions. Here the second order expansion coefficients - related to susceptibilities as e.g. χB=2P/μB2 - can be evaluated at vanishing μB and provide a first glance in μB direction at finite temperature T . Here P denotes the pressure which is identical to the (negative) grand-canonical partition function. Apart from susceptibilities χx also transport coefficients (shear viscosity η(T) , bulk viscosity ζ(T) , electric conductivity σe(T) , spatial diffusion constant Ds(T) for charm quarks etc.) can be calculated on the lattice although with still quite some uncertainties. These transport coefficients either enter the viscous hydro calculations (Section 2.2) as input or can be confronted with the Bayesian results from hydro (or hybrid) calculations in comparison to a large set of different observables (cf. Section 2.2).

On the other hand, the microscopic transport models can be studied also in a finite box at some initial energy density ϵ and net-particle number density nB employing periodic boundary conditions. Within the Kubo formalism [72] or the relaxation-time approximation (RTA) [73] then the transport coefficients can be determined in equilibrium (after some finite equilibration time to determine the thermodynamic variables T and μB ) and be confronted with results from lQCD. Since in leading order the relation between pressure P and energy density ϵ is relevant or in particular the speed of sound squared cs2(T)=P/ϵ , the microscopic transport models, that claim to describe experimental data, also have to reproduce cs2(T) to provide a consistent picture. This excludes those models with massless weakly interacting partons since the EoS cannot be reproduced in the vicinity of the critical temperature Tc . We note in passing that explicit comparisons of both methods (Kubo and RTA) in Ref. [61] for η/s have shown that the solutions are rather close. This holds especially for the case of the scattering of massive partons where the transport cross section is not very different from the total cross section as also pointed out in Ref. [74].

Figure 1

η/s (a) and ζ/s versus scaled temperature T/Tc .(a) The symbols indicate the PHSD results of η/s from Ref. [61], calculated using different methods: the relaxation-time approximation (red line + diamonds) and the Kubo formalism (blue line + dots); the black line corresponds to the parametrization of the PHSD results for η/s . The orange short dashed line demonstrates the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound [21] (η/s)KSS=1/(4π) . The orange dashed line is the η/s of the VISHNU hydrodynamical model that was recently determined by a Bayesian analysis. (b) ζ/s from PHSD simulations from Ref. [61] and the ζ/s adapted in the hydrodynamical simulations of Ref. [75]. The symbols with (large) error bars are lQCD results from different groups. The figures are taken from Ref. [75].

In Fig. 1 we display different results for η/s (a) and ζ/s versus the scaled temperature T/Tc . All variants suggest that η/s has a minimum close to Tc whereas ζ/s shows a maximum close to Tc . It is worth noting that especially for the shear viscosity the results from PHSD simulations from the relaxation-time approximation (red line + diamonds) and the Kubo formalism (blue line + dots) are in close agreement with those from the Bayesian analysis within the VISHNU hydrodynamical model (orange dashed line) as well as with the results from lQCD. This demonstrates that the different theoretical methods outlined above come to approximately the same answers.

4. Summary

In this contribution we have briefly discussed the various models used for the description of observables from relativistic heavy-ion collisions in the energy range from the AGS to the LHC and pointed out their successes, range of applications and problems. Whereas statistical models provide no dynamical information the hydro or hybrid models need external information with respect to the transport coefficients and initial conditions/fluctuations. These models succeed in describing various phenomena of relativistic heavy-ion collisions and a Bayesian analysis of a large set of experimental data allows to pin down constraints on the transport coefficients of interest. On the other hand, microscopic transport models provide a bridge from p+p , to p+A and A+A collisions and allow for a transparent interpretation of differential particle spectra, collective flow and electromagnetic observables from experimental studies at various facilities and a wide energy range. It is interesting to note that different methods have almost converged to the same results for the shear viscosity (cf. Fig. 1) which demonstrates that complementary strategies lead to a closer physical understanding of the strongly interacting matter produced in heavy-ion reactions. Open problems in microscopic transport approaches are still many-body reactions, the dynamical modeling of first-order transitions, the formation of clusters as well as the inclusion of chiral anomalies.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge valuable discussions with J. Aichelin, S. A. Bass, O. Linnyk, V. Ozvenchuk, A. Palmese, E. Seifert, T. Steinert, V. Toneev, V. Voronyuk, and Y. Xu. This work has been supported by the “HIC for FAIR” framework of the “LOEWE” program, BMBF and DAAD.

References

1 

J. Y. Ollitrault Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flowPhysical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology19924622910.1103/PhysRevD.46.229

2 

U. Heinz P. Kolb Nucl. Phys. A200270226910.1016/S0375-9474(02)00714-5

3 

E. Shuryak V Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys20096248

4 

E. Shuryak V Nucl. Phys. A20057506410.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.022

5 

M. Gyulassy L. McLerran New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHICNuclear Physics A20057501306310.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.0342-s2.0-14044262196

6 

M. Cheng N. H. Christ S. Datta QCD equation of state with almost physical quark massesPhysical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology200877110.1103/PhysRevD.77.014511014511

7 

Y. Aoki Journal of High Energy Physics20090906088

8 

S. Borsanyi Fodor Z Hoelbling C Katz D Krieg Szabo K Phys. Lett. B2014730 99

9 

F. Karsch PoS2013CPOD2013046

10 

X. Luo N. Xu Nucl. Sci. Tech20172811210.1007/s41365-017-0257-0

11 

L. McLerran R. D. Pisarski Phases of dense quarks at large NcNuclear Physics A20077961-4831002-s2.0-3534900414210.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.08.013

12 

A. Andronic Nucl. Phys. A20108376510.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.02.005

13 

K. Fukushimi Sasaki C Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys2013729910.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.003

14 

P. Senger Lect. Notes Phys2011814681

15 

A. Andronic Eur. Phys. J. C201676107

16 

A. Andronic P. Braun-Munzinger K. Redlich J. Stachel Hadron yields, the chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase diagramJournal of Physics: Conference Series201777912-s2.0-8501412865910.1088/1742-6596/779/1/012012012012

17 

V. Vovchenko D. V. Anchishkin M. I. Gorenstein R. V. Poberezhnyuk H. Stoecker Critical fluctuations in models with van der waals interactionsActa Physica Polonica B20171037537582-s2.0-8503754729810.5506/APhysPolBSupp.10.753

18 

V. Vovchenko Equations of state for real gases on the nuclear scalePhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201796110.1103/PhysRevC.96.015206

19 

V. Vovchenko Phys. Rev. Lett2017118182301

20 

Y. B. Ivanov V. N. Russkikh V. D. Toneev Relativistic heavy-ion collisions within three-fluid hydrodynamics: hadronic scenarioPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics20067310.1103/physrevc.73.044904044904

21 

P. K. Kovtun D. T. Son A. O. Starinets Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physicsPhysical Review Letters2005941110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.1116011116012-s2.0-18044397667

22 

S. Jeon Schenke B Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2013281340011

23 

B. Schenke S. Jeon C. Gale Elliptic and Triangular Flow in Event-by-Event Physical Review Letters2011106410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.042301

24 

J. Steinheimer J. Aichelin M. Bleicher H. Stöcker Influence of the hadronic phase on observables in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisionsPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201795610.1103/PhysRevC.95.064902

25 

S. A. Bass J. Bernhard J. S. Moreland Determination of Quark-Gluon-Plasma Parameters from a Global Bayesian AnalysisNuclear Physics A201796767732-s2.0-8503200878910.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.05.052

26 

I. Karpenko Bernhard J E Bass S A2017170603666

27 

Y. Xu NahrgangM Cao S Bernhard J E Bass S A2017171000807

28 

J. E. Bernhard J. S. Moreland S. A. Bass J. Liu U. Heinz Applying Bayesian parameter estimation to relativistic heavy-ion collisions: Simultaneous characterization of the initial state and quark-gluon plasma mediumPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201694210.1103/PhysRevC.94.024907

29 

S. Pratt Young C Phys. Rev. C201795054901

30 

E. Sangaline Pratt S Phys. Rev. C201693024908

31 

S. Pratt E. Sangaline P. Sorensen H. Wang Constraining the Equation of State of Superhadronic Matter from Heavy-Ion CollisionsPhysical Review Letters20151142010.1103/PhysRevLett.114.202301

32 

H. Song S. A. Bass U. W. Heinz Spectra and elliptic flow for identified hadrons in 2.76A TeV Pb + Pb collisionsPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics2014893910.1103/PhysRevC.89.034919034919

33 

S. Bass A Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys199842279

34 

H. Petersen Phys. Rev. C200878044901

35 

B. Schenke S. Schlichting 3D glasma initial state for relativistic heavy ion collisionsPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201694410.1103/PhysRevC.94.044907

36 

F. Gelis Schenke B Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66 732016

37 

B. Schenke P. Tribedy R. Venugopalan Fluctuating glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisionsPhysical Review Letters2012108252-s2.0-8486253437610.1103/PhysRevLett.108.252301252301

38 

B. Schenke Tribedy P Venugopalan R Nucl. Phys. A2014931288

39 

K. Werner Karpenko I Pierog T Bleicher M Mikhailov Phys. Rev. C201082044904

40 

K. Werner I. Karpenko M. Bleicher T. Pierog S. Porteboeuf-Houssais Jets, bulk matter, and their interaction in heavy ion collisions at several TeVPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201285610.1103/PhysRevC.85.064907

41 

M. Nahrgang J. Aichelin S. Bass P. B. Gossiaux K. Werner Heavy-flavor observables at RHIC and LHCNuclear Physics A20149315755802-s2.0-8492232658210.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.08.094

42 

H. van Hees C. Gale R. Rapp Thermal photons and collective flow at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy-Ion ColliderPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201184510.1103/PhysRevC.84.054906

43 

J. Paquet F Phys. Rev. C201693044906

44 

P. Arnold B Moore G D Yae L Journal of High Energy Physics20010112009

45 

W. Cassing V. Metag U. Mosel K. Niita Production of energetic particles in heavy-ion collisionsPhysics Reports199018863634492-s2.0-1384430204410.1016/0370-1573(90)90164-W

46 

C. Hartnack R. K. Puri J. Aichelin Modelling the many-body dynamics of heavy ion collisions: present status and future perspectiveThe European Physical Journal A1998115116910.1007/s100500050045

47 

A. B. Larionov W. Cassing C. Greiner U. Mosel Squeeze-out of nuclear matter in peripheral heavy-ion collisions and momentum-dependent effective interactionsPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics200062610.1103/PhysRevC.62.064611

48 

W. Cassing Bratkovskaya E L Phys. Rep19993086510.1016/S0370-1573(98)00028-3

49 

W. Ehehalt W. Cassing Relativistic transport approach for nucleus-nucleus collisions from SIS to SPS energiesNuclear Physics A19966023-44494862-s2.0-003056758710.1016/0375-9474(96)00097-8

50 

E. Bratkovskaya L Phys. Rev. C200469054907

51 

E. L. Bratkovskaya S. Soff H. Stöcker M. van Leeuwen W. Cassing Evidence for Nonhadronic Degrees of Freedom in the Transverse Mass Spectra of Kaons from Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions?Physical Review Letters200492310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.032302

52 

Z. Lin W Phys. Rev. C200572064901

53 

W. N. Zhang S. X. Li C. Y. Wong M. J. Efaaf Signals in single-event pion interferometry for granular sources of quark-gluon plasma dropletsPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics200571064908

54 

C. M. Ko T. Song F. Li V. Greco S. Plumari Partonic mean-field effects on matter and antimatter elliptic flowsNuclear Physics A20149282342462-s2.0-8490557450710.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.05.016

55 

M. Ruggieri F. Scardina S. Plumari V. Greco Elliptic flow from non-equilibrium initial condition with a saturation scalePhysics Letters B20137271-31771812-s2.0-8488740656210.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.014

56 

R. Marty E. Bratkovskaya W. Cassing J. Aichelin H. Berrehrah Transport coefficients from the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model for SU(3) Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics201388410.1103/PhysRevC.88.045204

57 

M. Ruggieri F. Scardina S. Plumari V. Greco Thermalization, isotropization, and elliptic flow from nonequilibrium initial conditions with a saturation scalePhysical Review C nuclear physics20148952-s2.0-8490193245210.1103/PhysRevC.89.054914054914

58 

W. Cassing Bratkovskaya E L Nucl., Phys. A, 831 215 Bratkovskaya E L, , 2011, Nucl. Phys. A2009856162

59 

O. Linnyk Bratkovskaya E Cassing W Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys2016875010.1016/j.ppnp.2015.12.003

60 

W. Cassing Eur. Phys. J. ST2009168 3

61 

V. Ozvenchuk LinnykO Gorenstein M I Bratkovskaya E L Cassing W201387024901

62 

V. Ozvenchuk LinnykO Gorenstein M I Bratkovskaya E L Cassing W201387064903

63 

W. Cassing O. Linnyk T. Steinert V. Ozvenchuk Electrical conductivity of hot QCD matterPhysical Review Letters2013110182-s2.0-8487778240410.1103/PhysRevLett.110.182301182301

64 

O. Linnyk V. Konchakovski T. Steinert W. Cassing E. L. Bratkovskaya Hadronic and partonic sources of direct photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisionsPhysical Review C nuclear physics20159252-s2.0-8494877717510.1103/PhysRevC.92.054914054914

65 

T. Song H. Berrehrah D. Cabrera J. M. Torres-Rincon L. Tolos W. Cassing E. Bratkovskaya Tomography of the quark-gluon plasma by charm quarksPhysical Review C nuclear physics20159212-s2.0-8493882374010.1103/PhysRevC.92.014910014910

66 

H. Berrehrah W. Cassing E. Bratkovskaya T. Steinert Quark susceptibility in a generalized dynamical quasiparticle modelPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics201693410.1103/PhysRevC.93.044914

67 

R. Rapp Adv. High Energy Phys. J420Proceedings of the Rapp R201301

68 

W. Cassing A. Palmese P. Moreau E. L. Bratkovskaya Chiral symmetry restoration versus deconfinement in heavy-ion collisions at high baryon densityPhysical Review C: Nuclear Physics20169312-s2.0-8495452319210.1103/PhysRevC.93.014902014902

69 

Palmese A Cassing W Seifert E Steinert T Moreau P Bratkovskaya E L 2016 Phys. Rev. C 94 044912

70 

W. Cassing Nucl. Phys. A2002700618

71 

E. Seifert Cassing W arXiv,

72 

R. Kubo Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problemsJournal of the Physical Society of Japan195712657058610.1143/jpsj.12.5702-s2.0-12344271673

73 

P. Chakraborty Kapusta J I Phys. Rev. C201183014906

74 

S. Plumari A. Puglisi F. Scardina V. Greco Shear viscosity of a strongly interacting system: Green-Kubo correlator versus Chapman-Enskog and relaxation-time approximationsPhysical Review C nuclear physics20128652-s2.0-8487020476410.1103/PhysRevC.86.054902054902

75 

Y. Xu Phys. Rev. C201796024902

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 23
  • Views 178

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 2413-5453